Sales Tax Holidays Reconsidered
As a followup to the list of this year’s state sales tax holidays that I published the other day, I thought I’d point out an article written by David Brunori, a professor of public policy at George Washington University who has been an outspoken critic of the regressive nature of sales taxes. Brunori argues that, although sales tax holidays are effective political gimmicks, they’re not good for much else. While this article was first published in 1999, Brunori continues to express this point of view today. Read on for the meat of Brunori’s argument…
…sales tax holidays fail to provide meaningful relief to those who need help the most. In that sense, they are poor vehicles for promoting tax justice. First of all, sales tax holidays do not provide significant relief to poor and lower-income taxpayers, who like everyone else shop year round. If they happen to miss the holiday, relief is denied.
Relief is dependent on knowing when (or even that) the tax holiday will take place. The experience in Texas suggests that retailers manage to get a lot of people into the stores. Yet it seems clear, to me anyway, that the wealthier you are the better information you have and the more likely you are to know about the tax holiday. Another problem is that tax holidays are always targeted toward families with school-age children. That is noble, but there are plenty of less fortunate people without children.
Moreover, there is evidence that retailers either temporarily raise prices or do not reduce prices during normal back- to-school sales. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence to support that finding. If it is true, neither the poor nor the rich are getting much of a break.
But the biggest problem is that tax holidays obscure the real inequities of the tax. The sales tax is unfair. Rather than addressing the unfairness in a comprehensive way, political leaders provide small, short-term relief. People in states with tax holidays still face regressive taxes 51 weeks a year.
From a tax policy perspective, holidays do not measure up very well either. As sales tax specialist John Mikesell has explained, tax holidays are an inefficient way of providing tax relief. Because they apply to everyone, rich and poor get to shop tax-free. The cost of providing relief to the poor is magnified by the cost of providing the same relief to the wealthy. Tax holidays also increase collection costs for administrators and vendors.
In fact, there’s been a bit of research on the effect of tax holidays on prices, and the results suggest that there might be something to Brunori’s arguments. So if you’re pumped up about the possibility of saving a bundle during a tax holiday, do your homework and make sure that you’re getting a deal.
Note: Special thanks to reader JimL for pointing out this issue in general and David Brunori’s views in particular.
Published on August 1st, 2005 - 4 Comments
Filed under: Taxes
email this article
- add to tip'd - stumble it - digg it - bookmark it
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» One Year Ago This Week (July 30th – August 5th)» From the Archives (July 29th – August 4th)
» Tax Holidays Starting Soon
» State Sales Tax Holidays
» How to Decide if Travelling to a Sales Tax Holiday is Worthwhile
» Home Sales UP in February
» Mall Jewelry Store ‘Sales’
» Gas Prices Drop, American Car Buyers Forego Economy
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
Great deals...
Readers’ choice...
Recent articles...
- Did Congress Make the Homebuyer Tax Credit Retroactive?
- Congress Extends $8000 Homebuyer Tax Credit, Adds New $6500 Credit
- Lending Club Update - October 2009 Performance
- How Much to Budget for Car Maintenance?
- Series I Savings Bonds Now Paying 3.36%
- Use Weight Loss Strategies to Get Out of Debt
- Weekly Roundup - Disney Shanghai Edition
- How to Save Money on Vacations
- Most and Least Reliable Cars - 2009 Edition
- Get 100 Free Trades from OptionsHouse Brokerage
Recent comments...
- Penny: I am about to purchase a new home.. which will be my new residence...
- APRIL DAYS: I FOR ONE HOPE THAT THE FIRST TIME HOMEOWNERS TAX CREDIT IS EXTENDED BECAUSE...
- JB: I drive a 1999 car and save $60 a month for car repairs, oil...
- Greta: My significant other and I bought a house in February 2009. My boyfriend...
- Jay: Don't forget nCleaner 2nd for turning off widows firewall and windows defender...also use the...
- Bryan: @Doug - you said it... if you simply delayed the closing, it would have...
- Sympathetic Dish TSR: @ Bonnie: Is your HD tv a Flatscreen LCD style? If so then a...
- John DeFlumeri Jr: Thanks for explaining the tax credit. Too bad for those who purchase in...
Most talked about...
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- Would the "Fair Tax" Gut the Economy?
- Tax Stimulus Rebate Payments to Start Early
- Pay Off Mortgage Early? Or Invest?
- The Best Online Savings Accounts (Updated!)
- Life's Too Short to Drink Cheap Beer
- $7500 First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
Even if I don’t _save_ money, I’d prefer that it go to the store or the manufacturer or even some middleman distributor, rather than the government. Too bad there aren’t any tax holidays happening ’round here.
(It’s amazing to me that I’m still the #4 commenter here, despite the fact that this blog’s subject matter is entirely unrelated to any of the reasons I follow most of the blogs I do.
)
Comment by Matt — Aug 2nd 2005 @ 2:12 amEven if this isn’t your usual cup of tea, we still like having you around…
I don’t like tax holidays.
I do not buy on impulse on tax holidays. I buy when I NEEED things.
This makes me pay tax when I NEED things, and pay for the tax not payed for the people who buy on impulse.
Money And Investing
Comment by Jose Anes — Aug 25th 2005 @ 6:31 pm