How Flexible Spending Accounts SHOULD Work

Written by Nickel - 8 Comments

The ‘use-it-or-lose-it’ provision of tax-exempt flexible spending accounts really, really irks me. I just don’t get why it is that unspent money should be forfeited at the end of the year. Why should honest, hard-working people be penalized if they have an unexpectedly good year and spend less than anticipated on medical care? Likewise, why should people be forced into an overly conservative estimate of their likely medical expenses during the upcoming year just because they’re afraid of losing their balance at the end of the year — the money lost to unnecessary taxes is just as real as the money forfeited if people overestimate their qualified expenses.

Part of the problem seems to be that the IRS allows employers to set their own contribution limits for medical FSAs (see here for details) — if employers set a fairly high limit and employees are allowed to add and carry over money indefinitely, then I’m sure that more than a few enterprising souls would figure out a way to seriously abuse the system. But it doesn’t have to be that way. From my perspective, it would make far more sense if the IRS (or even employers) would just set a maximum limit on account balances. They could then allow you to carry money forward if necessary, and simply reduce your allowable contribution in the coming year by the amount that you are carrying over. For example, if the maximum balance for 2006 was (say) $4,000 and you ended up carrying $500 forward from 2005, then you would only be allowed to contribute a maximum of $3,500 for 2006 (giving you a total balance of $4,000). That way nobody would be able to accumulate an unlimited pile of cash in their FSA, nobody would have to forfeit unspent dollars at the end of the year, and nobody would be forced into making overly conservative contributions for fear of losing unspent money.

One difficulty with this plan is that open enrollment is typically in the fall (at least at my employer), but you have until the end of December to incur eligible expenses. On top of that, you often have an additional two months to claim your refund. Thus, the year could be nearly a quarter over before you (or your employer or the IRS) would know how much you had left at the end of the previous year. However, it wouldn’t be all that difficult to simply adjust down the remaining contributions to fit under the cap, and possibly add penalties where necessary. Another possible difficulty is that you’re allowed to take money out of FSAs faster than you put it in, which can result in a shortfall for the employer if an employee cashes in and splits. From what I’ve heard (read the comments following this article), the forfeited money is used to help offset these sorts of shortfalls. Although I’ve personally benefitted from this loophole, I don’t think that it’s unreasonable to expect employees to pay back their excess withdrawals if they leave a job before sufficient contributions have been made.

The bottom line is that, although this might take a bit of additional work and creative thinking to implement, it’s definitely doable, and it would end up being a far more fair system than what is currently in place.

Published on August 9th, 2005 - 8 Comments
Filed under: Taxes
email this article email this article - add to tip'd - stumble it - digg it - bookmark it

About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!

Related articles...

» Flexible Spending Account Maxed out for 2006
» Flexible Spending Account Spent Out for 2007
» Flexible Spending Closed out at a Profit
» Your Flexible Spending Account (FSA) After a Layoff
» One Year Ago This Week (August 6th - August 12th)
» Help a Reader: Flexible Spending Account (FSA) Overspending
» Open Enrollment and our Flexible Spending Account
» Creative Use of Your Flexible Spending Account

Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:

You will receive only the daily updates, and can unsubscribe at anytime.

Comments (scroll down to add your own):

  1. The way I understand it, any forfeited money goes back to the empoloyer.

    In my case, my employer has commited to returning any forfeitted money back to the employee. They are looking into ways to carry this over tax-free, but if that doesn’t work, they will cut bonus checks for the ammount. In this case we will be taxed on the money, but won’t lose it!

    My employer also matches medical FSA contributions 2 for 1 up to $1000 matching. I put in $500, the company puts in $1000. Why wouln’t you without the threat of losing it?

    The reason my company is doing this is in an effort to move toward a medical savings account model with high deductible insurance only covering high dollar events. The goal is to enable employees to build a medical nest egg to cover the difference.

    Comment by Kris — Aug 10th 2005 @ 7:57 am
  2. I agree — it seems all messed up from a practical applications standpoint. It’s so bad that it’s almost not worth the hassle for me.

    Comment by FMF — Aug 10th 2005 @ 11:48 am
  3. I love this idea!

    Comment by MM — Aug 22nd 2005 @ 11:29 am
  4. Personal Spending Accounts have been in the agenda for the current congress. At some point there was a proposal stating that money not used could be carried over. Maybe it will be discussed when the Congress comes back from recess.

    Comment by Jose Anes — Aug 28th 2005 @ 12:03 pm

Leave a comment

Subscribe without commenting

Get free updates...

Articles via e-mail:

(Or get articles via Twitter)

Search this site...

Sponsors...



Great deals...

Readers’ choice...

Recent articles...

Recent comments...

  • William: m I not entitled to my opinhion? Wait until you reach 75 years of...
  • BillyR: Re: By the way, BillyR’s comment regarding “illegals” getting...
  • mrm: you answer emails? :P
  • Paul Fernandez: I’ve reviewed most of these comments, including reading...
  • William: Since Dollar Savings rate stopped dropping and has held steady at 2%...
  • Michael: I used to love ING, but their customer service and how they treat...
  • Tammy: I counted out all of my change and was going to take it to the bank...
  • Nickel: Arvin: Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at...

Most talked about...

Disclaimer...

    The terms of third-party offers referenced on this website are subject to change without notice. While we strive to maintain timely and accurate information, offer details may be out of date. Visitors should thus verify the terms of any such offers prior to participating in them. Please see our terms of service for additional details.