Vanguard Changes Transaction Rules
A few weeks ago, we received a letter from The Vanguard Group detailing changes that they will be implementing in order to discourage customers from flipping in and out of their funds. In short, investors won’t be allowed to buy shares of a particular Vanguard fund online or via phone, fax, or wire if they’ve sold shares of that same fund within the past 60 days. Customers will, however, still be able to make such purchases by mailing in a check. Money-market funds, short-term bond funds, and VIPER exchange-traded funds are all exempt from the new policy, which takes effect on September 30, 2005. Also exempt as are asset transfers, rollovers, check-writing redemptions and most automatic transactions. According to Vanguard, they’re taking these steps to “protect shareholders from the potentially harmful effects of frequent trading and market-timing.” All in all, I’d have to say that this is good news for buy-and-hold investors as it should help to keep costs down.
Published on August 30th, 2005 - 7 Comments
Filed under: Saving & Investing
email this article
- bookmark it
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» One Year Ago This Week (August 27th – September 2nd)» Converting Mutual Funds Into Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) Without Incurring Taxes
» From the Archives (August 26th – September 1st)
» Vanguard Removes Annual Account Fee
» Favorite Mutual Fund Companies: The Results
» Opening a Vanguard SEP-IRA and Executing a Direct Rollover
» Have the Rules Changed?
» Rules Regarding No-Interest Family Loans
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
Great deals...
Readers’ choice...
Recent articles...
- Effect of Foreclosure, Short Sale, and Bankruptcy on Your Credit Score
- DIY Garage Kayak Racks: Fast, Frugal, and Effective
- Lending Club $25 Bonus Reminder
- Coupons are a Waste?
- How to Save Money on Pet Care
- Best HSA Custodian?
- Considering a High Deductible Health Plan
- Pay Back the Homebuyer Tax Credit?
- How to Find a Good Deal
- How Much Does Your Debt Cost?
Recent comments...
- Tim Rosen: Pros and Cons: Pros: a.) A systematic discipline to save/invest on a regular basis, for a...
- Matt Jabs: @Tim: Thanks, I hope this article helps get even one person on the...
- Tim Rosen: Excellent Matt! A very practical, real-world plan that I believe anyone can "flesh out"....
- Jerry Robertson: Your article has great information about the large companies going out of business, but...
- laura: I have a foreclosure on my credit from Jan 2007 and my FICO score...
- nickel: Ron: Good question, and I have no idea as to the answer. It could...
- Christina: While foreclosures wreck less havoc on the score than a bankruptcy (according to your...
- Ron: Why do you think those large mortgage lenders are switching over to Vantage? Does...
Most talked about...
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- Would the "Fair Tax" Gut the Economy?
- Tax Stimulus Rebate Payments to Start Early
- Pay Off Mortgage Early? Or Invest?
- The Best Online Savings Accounts (Updated!)
- Life's Too Short to Drink Cheap Beer
- $7500 First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
Stumble It!
Digg It!
Tip It!
del.ico.us
Facebook
Will probably mean less management fees.
Comment by Jose Anes — Aug 30th 2005 @ 11:40 amIt seems more likely that fees will fail to increase, as opposed to actually decreasing. But I’m a cynic.
I agree with you — good news. Doesn’t impact me (from a negative standpoint) since I buy and hold for a long, long time.
But if fees do go down (like Jose says), I’d REALLY love this. Especially since VG is a pretty inexpensive fund family already.
Comment by FMF — Aug 30th 2005 @ 2:11 pmI think this rule was incorporated to cut down on those people who conduct a lot of trades in and out of particular funds, and also to keep management fees down, but let’s not forget that there are some legitimate reasons why someone may want to sell and rebuy a fund within 60 days. Maybe a more fair rule would be to forbid such trades within a two week period, or for people who have conducted X number of similar trades within a certain time period. Just an idea …
Comment by Ian — Sep 2nd 2005 @ 10:42 amYou can still re-buy within sixty days, you just can’t do it on the web or via phone, fax or wire. You can still send them a check (or instruct them to do a transfer in writing). So you can still do what you need, but the mailing part makes it impossible to use their funds for market-timing. Two weeks would probably still have the same effect, though.
Forget about the fees going down. There is a very good potential of the capital gains taxes going down for the investors. This is a very good news for long term buy and holders.
Comment by The Real Returns — Sep 5th 2005 @ 5:18 pmAs of December 14, 2007, American clients residing in Canada are no longer able to purchase, rollover, or exchange from their accounts. The only option left is to redeem their shares.
Comment by A.R.E. Silva — Mar 27th 2008 @ 9:17 pmAfter 32 years of building up my IRA, Vanguard, which encouraged rounding up all our accounts into Vanguard, now gives us the royal screw.This is virtual fraud!
Vanguard is not recommended for Americans planning their retirement abroad.