<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improved Security for Online Banking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/10/25/improved-security-for-online-banking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/10/25/improved-security-for-online-banking/</link>
	<description>personal finance tips, tricks, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:21:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/10/25/improved-security-for-online-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-32233</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=191#comment-32233</guid>
		<description>I really like ING&#039;s clickable PIN pad. It is an excellent defense against key loggers on public computer (not that I&#039;d look at financial data on a public computer without additional security I have at my disposal). I agree the requirement of the Customer number is a pain (I don&#039;t remember mine, but I have it in a password protected application on my compurter and Pocket PC), I&#039;d much rather have a personal ID I can make up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like ING&#8217;s clickable PIN pad. It is an excellent defense against key loggers on public computer (not that I&#8217;d look at financial data on a public computer without additional security I have at my disposal). I agree the requirement of the Customer number is a pain (I don&#8217;t remember mine, but I have it in a password protected application on my compurter and Pocket PC), I&#8217;d much rather have a personal ID I can make up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Brockman</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/10/25/improved-security-for-online-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Brockman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=191#comment-720</guid>
		<description>This is really not new news. E*trade already has available an RSA token. Login requires both password and the changing token number. Well nigh impossible to hack because the number changes frequently</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really not new news. E*trade already has available an RSA token. Login requires both password and the changing token number. Well nigh impossible to hack because the number changes frequently</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/10/25/improved-security-for-online-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 07:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=191#comment-702</guid>
		<description>I have to wonder why they continue to require the account number, though, instead of creating login IDs. The account number is not a secret, but it is extremely difficult to remember, and a pain in the butt to keep entering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder why they continue to require the account number, though, instead of creating login IDs. The account number is not a secret, but it is extremely difficult to remember, and a pain in the butt to keep entering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
