<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money Moves for 2006, Part 1: Your Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/11/16/money-moves-for-2006-part-1-your-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/11/16/money-moves-for-2006-part-1-your-home/</link>
	<description>personal finance tips, tricks, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:39:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tom nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/11/16/money-moves-for-2006-part-1-your-home/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>tom nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=214#comment-965</guid>
		<description>I am one year into an ARM with 4.5% rate now and guaranteed not to go up for another 28 months. And then no more than 1% a year based on the government T-bill or something like that(sorry). Should I move to a fixed rate now? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one year into an ARM with 4.5% rate now and guaranteed not to go up for another 28 months. And then no more than 1% a year based on the government T-bill or something like that(sorry). Should I move to a fixed rate now? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/11/16/money-moves-for-2006-part-1-your-home/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=214#comment-830</guid>
		<description>If you are investing in real estate I&#039;d just add that you need to know that tax implications. Unfortunately, a lot of folks don&#039;t take that into consideration. I wrote this story http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/tax/20050922a1.asp that offers some advice in this area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are investing in real estate I&#8217;d just add that you need to know that tax implications. Unfortunately, a lot of folks don&#8217;t take that into consideration. I wrote this story <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/tax/20050922a1.asp" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.bankrate.com/brm/ne.....0922a1.asp</a> that offers some advice in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belasarius</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2005/11/16/money-moves-for-2006-part-1-your-home/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Belasarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=214#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Good advice all!  I would also suggest that if you&#039;re older you might also look into a 15 year fixed.  My wife and I are in our early 50&#039;s and locked in a 4.75% fixed at 15 years which will having us owning our home by the time we retire (Holy 1950&#039;s Batman!).  The advantage for younger homeowners who might be moving is that you do build equity faster and get lower rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice all!  I would also suggest that if you&#8217;re older you might also look into a 15 year fixed.  My wife and I are in our early 50&#8217;s and locked in a 4.75% fixed at 15 years which will having us owning our home by the time we retire (Holy 1950&#8217;s Batman!).  The advantage for younger homeowners who might be moving is that you do build equity faster and get lower rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
