Laundering Stamps
Have you ever run postage stamps through the washing machine? We did. And it was a reasonably full book. Bummer. And it was those new-fangled $0.39 stamps, too. But… We did learn something in the process (sort of). The stamps were far to beat up for us to use on an envelope, so my wife called the Post Office and asked if there was anything that we could do. She was told that we could glue the stamps to a sheet of paper and then turn them in for 90% of their face value. I’d never heard of that policy, so I thought I’d investigate a bit further.
After a bit of quick Googling, I ran across the following at the USPS web site:
Stamps that are damaged or otherwise unusable for postage (because of humidity, moisture, or other causes) while in a customer’s possession may be exchanged only for an equal number of stamps of the same denomination. Unusable stamps accepted from a customer under these conditions must be those on sale at post offices within 12 months before the transaction. Quantities of the same denomination over $10 must be returned in the same configuration as when bought, i.e., sheets, coils, booklets. Each such transaction is limited to $100 worth of postage from each customer.
Nowhere in there does it say anything about getting just 90% back (and we were talking about an amount under $10, so the ‘configuration’ bit shouldn’t have mattered). As it turns out, we never got the chance to follow up on this, as the stamps ended up getting scattered to the four winds (more accurately, they got scattered by the four boys) before we had a chance to bring them in. But the lesson here is that, if you’ve got a bunch of damaged stamps, all is not lost — apparently you can still get credit for turning them in.
Published on February 9th, 2006 - 9 Comments
Filed under: Miscellany
email this article
- bookmark it
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» The Best of FCN – Selections from 02/06» Stamp Price Increase Reminder
» Stamp Price Increase (Again)
» Stamp Prices Increase (Yet Again)
» Stamps are now $0.39
» The New ‘Forever’ Stamp
» Exchanging Damaged Money
» Stamp Prices Increased This Week
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
Great deals...
Readers’ choice...
Recent articles...
- Effect of Foreclosure, Short Sale, and Bankruptcy on Your Credit Score
- DIY Garage Kayak Racks: Fast, Frugal, and Effective
- Lending Club $25 Bonus Reminder
- Coupons are a Waste?
- How to Save Money on Pet Care
- Best HSA Custodian?
- Considering a High Deductible Health Plan
- Pay Back the Homebuyer Tax Credit?
- How to Find a Good Deal
- How Much Does Your Debt Cost?
Recent comments...
- iris bobi: I went to contract 4-2009 and going to close on my house either December...
- Tim Rosen: Pros and Cons: Pros: a.) A systematic discipline to save/invest on a regular basis, for a...
- Matt Jabs: @Tim: Thanks, I hope this article helps get even one person on the...
- Tim Rosen: Excellent Matt! A very practical, real-world plan that I believe anyone can "flesh out"....
- Jerry Robertson: Your article has great information about the large companies going out of business, but...
- laura: I have a foreclosure on my credit from Jan 2007 and my FICO score...
- nickel: Ron: Good question, and I have no idea as to the answer. It could...
- Christina: While foreclosures wreck less havoc on the score than a bankruptcy (according to your...
Most talked about...
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- Would the "Fair Tax" Gut the Economy?
- Tax Stimulus Rebate Payments to Start Early
- Pay Off Mortgage Early? Or Invest?
- The Best Online Savings Accounts (Updated!)
- Life's Too Short to Drink Cheap Beer
- $7500 First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
Stumble It!
Digg It!
Tip It!
del.ico.us
Facebook
You can do something similar with damaged paper money at the bank. In fact, I have heard that all you need is at least half of the bill, and they’ll replace it. So, you *can* light your cigarettes with $100 bills–just put them out before they burn half way through!
Comment by Daytonscott — Feb 9th 2006 @ 1:15 pmNickel: Think of stamps like cash. They are legal tender.
Daytonscott: And don’t light your $100 bill in front of the popo since you can be arrested for that. Defacing money, and all that jazz…
Comment by Blaine Moore — Feb 9th 2006 @ 1:58 pmGood tip Nickel… I’ll have to remember this one.
Comment by jim — Feb 9th 2006 @ 3:46 pmI have even been able to get a refund from stamps. And they have also changed the denomination of my stamps for higher ones.
I do collect stamps. And I do buy old collections and big lots, sepparating them into valuable and unvaluable things. Sometimes I have mint US stamps that have no real value (nobody would buy them for more than face). I use them for postage. But a bunch of 3c stamps is not fun to put as postage. So I have changed for higher denominations.
Comment by Jose — Feb 10th 2006 @ 9:02 amI know people use enjoy peppering priority mail envelopes with small denomination stamps. it’s kind of funny to see sometimes too, you can fit a lot of stamps on them…
Comment by jim — Feb 10th 2006 @ 10:02 amthanks .. learn something new every day!
Comment by Nikki — Feb 12th 2006 @ 8:13 amThat process seems complicated. I’ve just walked up to the counter at the post office and showed them stamps stuck together and been able to get them replaced for full face value.
Why not give that a try first? Simple!
Comment by mapgirl — Feb 18th 2006 @ 10:15 pmOne is the “official” way and the other one is the real way that real people do it.
I saw someone ask for $2 in 2 cent stamps the other day at the post office until the teller talked some sense into the person and he realized he didn’t actually need a hundred 2 cent stamps.
Comment by jim — Feb 19th 2006 @ 1:17 pm