Rules Regarding No-Interest Family Loans

Written by nickel - 6 Comments

I’ve written in the past about using gift funds from a family member to aid in the purchase a home, including how to write a mortgage gift letter. But what if you’re interested in using a no-interest loan from a family member, as opposed to a gift?

Well, assuming that you’ll be using these funds in conjunction with a standard mortgage, it’s always possible that you could ease the underwriting process by using a gift letter to satisfy the mortgage lender, even though the transaction is truly a loan (note that I’m not recommending this — just saying that it’s possible). While this might get around some difficulties with regard to underwriting, however, there are still some important IRS rules to deal with when it comes to making (or accepting) a loan of this sort…

In short, the IRS doesn’t want people to use family loans as a tax dodge — consider the case of a wealthy individual who provides their child (who resides in a lower tax bracket) with a no-interest (or even low interest) loan such that they can invest it and pay far less in taxes. While this was once possible, that loophole has now been closed. Indeed, the IRS now assumes that interest is being charged on the loan amount, and they further treat this uncollected interest as a gift. And if the amount of uncollected interest exceeds the Federal gift tax exclusion, the lender may be liable for gift taxes.

As is the case with nearly all IRS regulations, however, there are exceptions. First and foremost, if the amount of the loan is $10,000 or less, the IRS will simply ignore it. And for loans of up to $100,000 the IRS will not get involved as long as the borrower’s investment earnings don’t exceed $1,000 per year.

If your loan doesn’t fall under one of these exemptions, then it’s subject to the IRS’s imputed-interest rules (this is sometimes also referred to as ‘phantom’ interest). What this means is that the IRS will do you the favor of calculating the interest dues based on IRS-set rates (the ‘applicable federal rate’ or AFR), and will then tax the lender for the foregone interest. Another wrinkle (and this one actually works in your favor) is that the taxable interest cannot exceed the borrower’s investment earnings for the year. Note that, even if this is not an interest-free loan, the imputed-tax rules could kick in if the interest rate falls below the AFR — in this case, the imputed interest would be proportional to the difference between the AFR and the actual rate being charged.

As a quick (and very simple) example, assume that Bob borrows from his parents an amount in excess of the $10,000 threshold under which the IRS will ignore the transaction. This is a no-interest loan that is intended to help Bob by a house but, as it turns out, Bob ends up earning $1,700 in interest and dividends from his investments. Now let’s assume that the IRS does the imputed interest calculations and concludes that Bob should have paid $3,300 in interest. In this case, the loan interest is taxable (since Bob’s investments earned more than $1,000), but the taxable amount (for the lender) is just $1,700 instead of $3,300 (i.e., it’s capped at Bob’s investment earnings).

Another thing to watch out for is that, if the loan is used to purchase an income-producing asset, the loan automatically falls under the imputed interest rules.

For more information on moving, check out my Roadmap for a Successful Relocation.

[Source: H&R Block]

Published on May 9th, 2006 - 6 Comments
Filed under: Mortgages, Real Estate, Taxes
digg this - stumble it - save to del.icio.us

Related articles...

     » From the Archives (May 6th - May 12th)
     » The Best of FCN — Selections from 05/06
     » Carnivals - Week of 05/15/06
     » Carnivals - Week of 07/10/06
     » The Ins and Outs of Bridge Loans
     » Capital One Jacks Up Interest Rates
     » Georgia Upholds Ban on Payday Loans
     » From the Archives (May 4th - May 31st)

Comments (scroll down to add your own):

  1. Actually, the gift amount is now $11K. That’s what my mortgage banker told me two years ago when I got a gift from my folks.

    Comment by mapgirl — May 9th 2006 @ 8:04 am
  2. You are correct that the gift limit is now $11k. But the cutoff for the IRS ignoring a loan is still $10k. If it goes over $10k, then it is potentially subject to the imputed interest rules.

    Comment by nickel — May 9th 2006 @ 8:10 am
  3. what does it mean “And for loans of up to $100,000 the IRS will not get involved as long as the borrower’s investment earnings don’t exceed $1,000 per year.” as stated in your article. Also, is there a “button” to forward your articles via e-mail to a friend? (Did I miss it?) Thanks!

    Comment by GoldenFortune — Oct 16th 2007 @ 1:20 pm

Leave a comment

Subscribe without commenting

Subscribe for free updates...


Search this site...

Sponsors...

Great deals...

Readers’ Choice...

Recent articles...

Recent comments...

  • Kyler: The S&L crisis of the 80’s started out slow and then gained...
  • Angel: What’s your opinion of a real estate purchase contract which has...
  • moneyman: Recent bank failures are down to greed, they were too eager to...
  • Vi: Just a bit of Real Estate Law: You do own half the sky above and the...
  • James: Definitely don’t put more than 100k(200k for joint account) at a...
  • Don Henderson: I purchased a $1,000 fridge, $449 washer, $379 dryer. and $59...
  • Kyler: Just because a bank loans out $100.00 does not mean they have $100.00...
  • jay: Great article! Will have to save this info in case we have problems....

Most talked about...