<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you Saving Enough for Retirement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/</link>
	<description>personal finance tips, tricks, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:35:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Richmond</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/comment-page-1/#comment-28204</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/#comment-28204</guid>
		<description>The dinkytown calculators are cool, but for long range planning you really need to use a planner that takes portfolio volatility into account rather than assuming a steady return each year.  

These more sophisticated calculators use either historical market data or Monte Carlo simulation to take volatility into account.

A couple of good ones are 

www.flexibleRetirementPlanner.com

www.FIRECalc.com

They are both free and run inside your web browser.  Try these with the same inputs you used on the dinkytown calculator and notice the difference.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dinkytown calculators are cool, but for long range planning you really need to use a planner that takes portfolio volatility into account rather than assuming a steady return each year.  </p>
<p>These more sophisticated calculators use either historical market data or Monte Carlo simulation to take volatility into account.</p>
<p>A couple of good ones are </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flexibleRetirementPlanner.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.flexibleRetirementPlanner.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.FIRECalc.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.FIRECalc.com</a></p>
<p>They are both free and run inside your web browser.  Try these with the same inputs you used on the dinkytown calculator and notice the difference.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtc</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/comment-page-1/#comment-18657</link>
		<dc:creator>jtc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/#comment-18657</guid>
		<description>For anyone under the age of 30...  go ahead and do the calculations without Social Security.

To do otherwise is dangerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone under the age of 30&#8230;  go ahead and do the calculations without Social Security.</p>
<p>To do otherwise is dangerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/comment-page-1/#comment-16763</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 06:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/#comment-16763</guid>
		<description>Actually, I don&#039;t intend to retire. I figure, if I don&#039;t like the work I do enough to want to keep doing it regardless of how old or wealthy I am, then that&#039;s a sign I&#039;m already doing something wrong.

Doesn&#039;t mean I&#039;m not investing for the future, though.

The problem with these calculators is that so many factors depend on what happens in 2018 when it stops being possible to deny that Social Security is bankrupt. Does the government raise taxes, and thus drastically cut the income available to be diverted into savings? Do they try to monetize the debt, and the inflation rate goes from a sane number in the single digits to something like 75% as the dollar collapses? Just how much of the economy will be destroyed? Will Medicare be funded (making healthcare investments very safe ones) or killed (making them among the worst possible places to have money)?

Honestly, with all the uncertainty involved in planning that far out even if our massive scheme of intergenerational robbery _weren&#039;t_ about to collapse, the notion of &quot;retirement planning&quot; any more specific than &quot;save as much as you can, as diversely as you can, at as good a rate of return as you can get, and pray the politicians don&#039;t steal it all&quot; seems like folly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t intend to retire. I figure, if I don&#8217;t like the work I do enough to want to keep doing it regardless of how old or wealthy I am, then that&#8217;s a sign I&#8217;m already doing something wrong.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m not investing for the future, though.</p>
<p>The problem with these calculators is that so many factors depend on what happens in 2018 when it stops being possible to deny that Social Security is bankrupt. Does the government raise taxes, and thus drastically cut the income available to be diverted into savings? Do they try to monetize the debt, and the inflation rate goes from a sane number in the single digits to something like 75% as the dollar collapses? Just how much of the economy will be destroyed? Will Medicare be funded (making healthcare investments very safe ones) or killed (making them among the worst possible places to have money)?</p>
<p>Honestly, with all the uncertainty involved in planning that far out even if our massive scheme of intergenerational robbery _weren&#8217;t_ about to collapse, the notion of &#8220;retirement planning&#8221; any more specific than &#8220;save as much as you can, as diversely as you can, at as good a rate of return as you can get, and pray the politicians don&#8217;t steal it all&#8221; seems like folly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/comment-page-1/#comment-16666</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/#comment-16666</guid>
		<description>88 median life expectancy.  I&#039;ll take it...as long as I am still able to run (no matter how slowly)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>88 median life expectancy.  I&#8217;ll take it&#8230;as long as I am still able to run (no matter how slowly)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mapgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/comment-page-1/#comment-16653</link>
		<dc:creator>mapgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/#comment-16653</guid>
		<description>WOW. Very interesting. Quite an eye opener.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. Very interesting. Quite an eye opener.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Prince of Thrift</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/comment-page-1/#comment-16617</link>
		<dc:creator>the Prince of Thrift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2006/08/08/are-you-saving-enough-for-retirement/#comment-16617</guid>
		<description>Life Expectancy: 80.27
Lower Quartile : 72.74
Median Lifetime: 81.96
Upper Quartile : 89.26

As you can see with my life expectancy and with what will probably be retirement age by the time I get to retirement...I will have already died or will only a few years to live...if everything is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life Expectancy: 80.27<br />
Lower Quartile : 72.74<br />
Median Lifetime: 81.96<br />
Upper Quartile : 89.26</p>
<p>As you can see with my life expectancy and with what will probably be retirement age by the time I get to retirement&#8230;I will have already died or will only a few years to live&#8230;if everything is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
