Economic Analysis of Halloween
I just ran across an interesting article on Bloomberg by Kevin Hassett that looks at Halloween through the eyes of an economist. In it, the author argued (somewhat tongue-in-cheek) that:
Economists haven’t … applied numbers to their laws, but if they did, the first law of economics would be that lump-sum transfers are more economically efficient than in-kind transfers. If you are going to give a gift to somebody, you should just give them the money. They will be a better judge of the best way to spend it.
If instead, you give them a specific good, then you make them worse off, unless you somehow miraculously anticipate what the recipient would purchase if he received the money instead.
So what can we do to improve things?
The first step would be for Halloween donors to give kids money instead of candy. Kids could then go to the supermarket the next day and binge on the candies they really like. That solution would get an A-plus in economics.
Actually, this option is even better than Hassett thinks, as these kids would be buying all their Halloween candy on sale!
But wait, it gets better…
Many schools prohibit children from taking Halloween candy onto the premises. That is exactly the wrong policy. Schools should encourage all children to bring their entire haul to school, and allow them a lengthy period to trade candies among themselves. That way, the Take 5s and the 100 Grand bars will find their way to individuals who cherish them.
Ahh… An efficient candy market!
A final measure would be to take on inefficient candy-giving at the source. As a conservative, I usually oppose heavy-handed regulation, but in this case, the stakes are too high. Perhaps confectioners should be required to only sell their Halloween candy in bags that mix many different types. That way, when families put the candy out for the trick-or-treaters, bowls will be filled with a wide variety of different types of candy, and each new child will be able to pick the confection that suits his or her fancy.
So there you have it… The cure for Halloween’s economic ills.
Have a safe and Happy Halloween. And try not to worry too much about all those Halloween urban legends that have haunted us since childhood.
[Source: Bloomberg.com]
Published on October 31st, 2006 - 5 Comments
Filed under: Economy
email this article
- add to tip'd - stumble it - digg it - bookmark it
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» From the Archives (October 28th – November 3rd)» Halloween Thoughts…
» Carnivals – Week of 11/06/06
» Halloween Treat Ideas (or Not)
» Where Do You Stand?
» Halloween Safety Tips
» Tax Rebate Details Announced
» Tax Stimulus Rebate is Now Law
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
Great deals...
Readers’ choice...
Recent articles...
- Did Congress Make the Homebuyer Tax Credit Retroactive?
- Congress Extends $8000 Homebuyer Tax Credit, Adds New $6500 Credit
- Lending Club Update - October 2009 Performance
- How Much to Budget for Car Maintenance?
- Series I Savings Bonds Now Paying 3.36%
- Use Weight Loss Strategies to Get Out of Debt
- Weekly Roundup - Disney Shanghai Edition
- How to Save Money on Vacations
- Most and Least Reliable Cars - 2009 Edition
- Get 100 Free Trades from OptionsHouse Brokerage
Recent comments...
- APRIL DAYS: I FOR ONE HOPE THAT THE FIRST TIME HOMEOWNERS TAX CREDIT IS EXTENDED BECAUSE...
- JB: I drive a 1999 car and save $60 a month for car repairs, oil...
- Greta: My significant other and I bought a house in February 2009. My boyfriend...
- Jay: Don't forget nCleaner 2nd for turning off widows firewall and windows defender...also use the...
- Bryan: @Doug - you said it... if you simply delayed the closing, it would have...
- Sympathetic Dish TSR: @ Bonnie: Is your HD tv a Flatscreen LCD style? If so then a...
- John DeFlumeri Jr: Thanks for explaining the tax credit. Too bad for those who purchase in...
- Hank: I always budget $100 a month for car repairs. I constantly find myself going...
Most talked about...
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- Would the "Fair Tax" Gut the Economy?
- Tax Stimulus Rebate Payments to Start Early
- Pay Off Mortgage Early? Or Invest?
- The Best Online Savings Accounts (Updated!)
- Life's Too Short to Drink Cheap Beer
- $7500 First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
Who knew that an Economist could be the scariest thing on Halloween. I hope that Santa doesn’t try to econmize by just wiring money to the bank account of good little boys and girls. It would mean that all of the elfs would be out of a job and Santa would have a Christmas feast of reindeer since they are no longer needed.
Comment by Adult ADD and Money — Oct 31st 2006 @ 4:13 pmThis is only true if the main goal of gift-giving is to be economically efficient.
I have received many gifts that I would not have purchased for myself, but I enjoy them and consider them a better gift than money would have been. (Though there have been plenty of cases where money would have been better …)
Comment by what do I know — Oct 31st 2006 @ 7:46 pmIt doesn’t take into account that Halloween would be much more expensive becasue if money were being handed out, much older children would continue trick or treat and probably for longer periods of time (more houses = more money) Maybe it’s isn’t efficient, but it is cheaper for those giving out the candy.
Comment by SavingAdvice — Nov 2nd 2006 @ 1:35 amand best of all i dont have to make a trip to buy candy and then stuff my face with leftovers. I can just hand the kids cash!
Comment by empty spaces — Nov 7th 2006 @ 3:44 amnow if only they’d take paypal!!!