<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Strategy for Blocking Comment Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/</link>
	<description>personal finance tips, tricks, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:39:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blaine Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-67599</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/#comment-67599</guid>
		<description>Well, I had a system like that as well, but I recently changed hosts and I haven&#039;t updated my IP bans again so my spam has picked up again.  When the worst offendors plugin just listed by IP address then when I saw an IP over and over again I tended to add them to the ban list, but now I need to make a new one and/or start using htaccess to ban IP addresses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I had a system like that as well, but I recently changed hosts and I haven&#8217;t updated my IP bans again so my spam has picked up again.  When the worst offendors plugin just listed by IP address then when I saw an IP over and over again I tended to add them to the ban list, but now I need to make a new one and/or start using htaccess to ban IP addresses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-67598</link>
		<dc:creator>nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/#comment-67598</guid>
		<description>Well, yes, but something more than that. Blocking by IP restricts access to the site entirely, but only for targeted IPs. This is a more general solution, but I&#039;m not going to post the details here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes, but something more than that. Blocking by IP restricts access to the site entirely, but only for targeted IPs. This is a more general solution, but I&#8217;m not going to post the details here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-67597</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/#comment-67597</guid>
		<description>I assume that you are using akismet with the worst offendors plugin (as I saw you commenting in his support forums)?  That&#039;s the method that I use, and I think that it has worked out pretty well for myself.  It certainly makes finding false positives pretty easy; if somebody gets 4 false positives within a few hour time span then they may be out of luck, but the times I&#039;ve validated ahead of time that hasn&#039;t been an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that you are using akismet with the worst offendors plugin (as I saw you commenting in his support forums)?  That&#8217;s the method that I use, and I think that it has worked out pretty well for myself.  It certainly makes finding false positives pretty easy; if somebody gets 4 false positives within a few hour time span then they may be out of luck, but the times I&#8217;ve validated ahead of time that hasn&#8217;t been an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-67596</link>
		<dc:creator>nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/#comment-67596</guid>
		<description>Colin: Thanks for your reply. The most likely cause of your past comments getting filtered was because of the inclusion of unnecessary urls. If you need to include a url to make a point, then fine. But keep in mind that url inclusion *does* increase the chances of being flagged as spam. So if you&#039;re just looking to drop a link back to your site (as you did above) then don&#039;t... Your name is already hotlinked back to your site so it&#039;s totally unnecessary and, again, it increases the chances of getting caught.

Also keep in mind that Akismet is a distributed filter, so if you leave questionable comments on someone else&#039;s site and they get flagged as spam, your comments will be treated as such when you come here. I&#039;m not saying you did this, just explaining how it works.

In the future, if you leave a legitimate comment and it doesn&#039;t show up immediately, then by all means drop me a line. Use the contact link in the header, and be sure to include your url or the name you used when commenting so I&#039;ll have a string to search with). I&#039;ll fish it out and the filter *should* learn (though it doesn&#039;t always happen immediately).

Thanks for your feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin: Thanks for your reply. The most likely cause of your past comments getting filtered was because of the inclusion of unnecessary urls. If you need to include a url to make a point, then fine. But keep in mind that url inclusion *does* increase the chances of being flagged as spam. So if you&#8217;re just looking to drop a link back to your site (as you did above) then don&#8217;t&#8230; Your name is already hotlinked back to your site so it&#8217;s totally unnecessary and, again, it increases the chances of getting caught.</p>
<p>Also keep in mind that Akismet is a distributed filter, so if you leave questionable comments on someone else&#8217;s site and they get flagged as spam, your comments will be treated as such when you come here. I&#8217;m not saying you did this, just explaining how it works.</p>
<p>In the future, if you leave a legitimate comment and it doesn&#8217;t show up immediately, then by all means drop me a line. Use the contact link in the header, and be sure to include your url or the name you used when commenting so I&#8217;ll have a string to search with). I&#8217;ll fish it out and the filter *should* learn (though it doesn&#8217;t always happen immediately).</p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crediteria.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-67590</link>
		<dc:creator>Crediteria.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/02/14/new-strategy-for-blocking-comment-spam/#comment-67590</guid>
		<description>Hey Mr. Nickel,

I had left comments in your blog a while ago and got caught in a filter. 

Your blog has been one of my sources of inspiration for my website. I hope to be able to come and comment and invite you to comment on my blog.

I am a real guy making real comments looking to be active in the financial community. Not some pinhead comment spammer. 

Anyway, I would love to hear about your efforts to stop comment spam. I know the pains and have been looking for my own solutions to stop blog abuse.

Best Regards,
Colin McDougall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mr. Nickel,</p>
<p>I had left comments in your blog a while ago and got caught in a filter. </p>
<p>Your blog has been one of my sources of inspiration for my website. I hope to be able to come and comment and invite you to comment on my blog.</p>
<p>I am a real guy making real comments looking to be active in the financial community. Not some pinhead comment spammer. </p>
<p>Anyway, I would love to hear about your efforts to stop comment spam. I know the pains and have been looking for my own solutions to stop blog abuse.</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Colin McDougall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
