<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avoid Check Washing With Special Ink?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/</link>
	<description>personal finance tips, tricks, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:51:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-116250</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoiding-check-washing-with-special-ink/#comment-116250</guid>
		<description>The uniball signo 207 is very resistant to washing with the most common organic solvents in my own testing

actually ballpoint pens hold up better than most gel inks other than the uniball singo 207.

the uniball signo rt 0.38mm seems to hold up just as well as the signo 207 ink even though they don&#039;t say anything about anti check washing.

Also if you use fountain pens Noodler inks has a security challenge to prove their inks are resistant to check washing.
http://www.noodlersink.com/challenge.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The uniball signo 207 is very resistant to washing with the most common organic solvents in my own testing</p>
<p>actually ballpoint pens hold up better than most gel inks other than the uniball singo 207.</p>
<p>the uniball signo rt 0.38mm seems to hold up just as well as the signo 207 ink even though they don&#8217;t say anything about anti check washing.</p>
<p>Also if you use fountain pens Noodler inks has a security challenge to prove their inks are resistant to check washing.<br />
<a href="http://www.noodlersink.com/challenge.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.noodlersink.com/challenge.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Durnack</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-75631</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Durnack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoiding-check-washing-with-special-ink/#comment-75631</guid>
		<description>I have conducted actual tests in check washing.  It is a process that takes about 15-30 seconds using some very common materials, which I will not divulge. 

Bic makes a pen also that cannot be &quot;washed&quot;, it is a common 59 cent Bic Roller-Ball.  It has the same &quot;special ink&quot; that Eberhard Faber is using, without the special marketing costs.

We tried to remove the ROller Ball ink with everything that was used to rinse the traditional ink.  The result was we started removing and smearing the print on the check itself.  The Roller ink stood strong!

Traditional ink is like paint and stays on the surface.  Roller Ball ink is very thin and a much different consistency that gets absorbed into the paper fibers.  Much like fabric die.

Nickel is correct, keeping those checks safe in the first place is priority one.  Using a Bic Roller Ball is a good safety net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have conducted actual tests in check washing.  It is a process that takes about 15-30 seconds using some very common materials, which I will not divulge. </p>
<p>Bic makes a pen also that cannot be &#8220;washed&#8221;, it is a common 59 cent Bic Roller-Ball.  It has the same &#8220;special ink&#8221; that Eberhard Faber is using, without the special marketing costs.</p>
<p>We tried to remove the ROller Ball ink with everything that was used to rinse the traditional ink.  The result was we started removing and smearing the print on the check itself.  The Roller ink stood strong!</p>
<p>Traditional ink is like paint and stays on the surface.  Roller Ball ink is very thin and a much different consistency that gets absorbed into the paper fibers.  Much like fabric die.</p>
<p>Nickel is correct, keeping those checks safe in the first place is priority one.  Using a Bic Roller Ball is a good safety net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saving advice</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-70694</link>
		<dc:creator>saving advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 14:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoiding-check-washing-with-special-ink/#comment-70694</guid>
		<description>Interesting...I&#039;m so out of touch with checks since they really don&#039;t exist in Japan. Good to know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;I&#8217;m so out of touch with checks since they really don&#8217;t exist in Japan. Good to know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-70401</link>
		<dc:creator>nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoiding-check-washing-with-special-ink/#comment-70401</guid>
		<description>I would imagine that the ink from Bic Stics would wash pretty easily -- that&#039;s just a regular ballpoint, right? So the ink is just riding on the surface.

As for carrying checks with you, I only bring a check when I know I&#039;m going to use it. In this age of plastic, there&#039;s no real need. But that doesn&#039;t protect you from check washing, which happens after you part ways with your check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would imagine that the ink from Bic Stics would wash pretty easily &#8212; that&#8217;s just a regular ballpoint, right? So the ink is just riding on the surface.</p>
<p>As for carrying checks with you, I only bring a check when I know I&#8217;m going to use it. In this age of plastic, there&#8217;s no real need. But that doesn&#8217;t protect you from check washing, which happens after you part ways with your check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mapgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-70399</link>
		<dc:creator>mapgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoiding-check-washing-with-special-ink/#comment-70399</guid>
		<description>Yum. Gel pens. I actually prefer BIC stics and I never carry blank checks with me. I don&#039;t understand people who do that. I write checks at home and that&#039;s it.

There&#039;s a nice BIC gel pen my office uses. I have generally had a preference for UNIBALL and BIC brands since high school. Pilot Rollerballs are ok too, but they can get squidgy and leave a blot when you first touch the page. I could geek out endlessly about pen and pen technology. Whatever you do, don&#039;t write checks with a fountain pen and Parker Washable Blue ink, for obvious reasons. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yum. Gel pens. I actually prefer BIC stics and I never carry blank checks with me. I don&#8217;t understand people who do that. I write checks at home and that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a nice BIC gel pen my office uses. I have generally had a preference for UNIBALL and BIC brands since high school. Pilot Rollerballs are ok too, but they can get squidgy and leave a blot when you first touch the page. I could geek out endlessly about pen and pen technology. Whatever you do, don&#8217;t write checks with a fountain pen and Parker Washable Blue ink, for obvious reasons. <img src='http://www.fivecentnickel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-69915</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoiding-check-washing-with-special-ink/#comment-69915</guid>
		<description>I have been using a GEL pen for checkwriting after reading several articles that suggested it to combat check washing. The last time I went shopping for a new gel pen to replace mine I noticed they are now selling pens marked as esp for anti checkwashing. Same brand and it looked the same as my reg gel pen only they were charging more for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using a GEL pen for checkwriting after reading several articles that suggested it to combat check washing. The last time I went shopping for a new gel pen to replace mine I noticed they are now selling pens marked as esp for anti checkwashing. Same brand and it looked the same as my reg gel pen only they were charging more for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fellow traveler</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-69903</link>
		<dc:creator>fellow traveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoiding-check-washing-with-special-ink/#comment-69903</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t verified the ink for &#039;washing&#039; resistance, but I do enjoy the easy writing of this pen.  I use the .7mm size (medium) with black ink.  For my hand and grip, the pen is quite comfortable and doesn&#039;t slide around with the &#039;rubber-like&#039; coating near the writing end of the pen.

I recommend at least a trial of one each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t verified the ink for &#8216;washing&#8217; resistance, but I do enjoy the easy writing of this pen.  I use the .7mm size (medium) with black ink.  For my hand and grip, the pen is quite comfortable and doesn&#8217;t slide around with the &#8216;rubber-like&#8217; coating near the writing end of the pen.</p>
<p>I recommend at least a trial of one each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoid-check-washing-with-special-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-69900</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/03/28/avoiding-check-washing-with-special-ink/#comment-69900</guid>
		<description>The pens are nice, but I print my checks rather than write them out by hand.  If you use MICR toner (magnetic ink) and the check gets scrubbed, then the easiest thing to come off will be the signature.  If they did get the toner off of the check, then the magnetic residue could still be left behind and be verified at a later date during a dispute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pens are nice, but I print my checks rather than write them out by hand.  If you use MICR toner (magnetic ink) and the check gets scrubbed, then the easiest thing to come off will be the signature.  If they did get the toner off of the check, then the magnetic residue could still be left behind and be verified at a later date during a dispute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
