This week Georgia lawmakers narrowly rejected a bid to repeal a state law banning payday loans. Supporters of House Bill 163 have argued that the state went too far in banning payday lending back in May 2004, and they want to bring the industry back, albeit with new regulations.
Usury laws limit the interest rate amount a lender can charge. In Georgia, an unlicensed lender cannot charge more than eight percent interest on a loan of $3,000 or less.
They go on to state that:
The Industrial Loan Act of 1955 essentially made payday lending illegal, by requiring state licensing and registration and by imposing strict usury limits on small loans. In 2004, the Georgia General Assembly passed some new provisions to increase the fines and criminal penalties for people making small loans at illegal rates of interest. The law went into effect in May 2004, and though it is under review in the federal courts, it is currently in effect. Referred to as the Payday Lending Act of 2004, this law authorizes felony and racketeering charges against violators, as well as fines of up to $25,000 per violation and a possible jail sentence of 25 years.
The new bill would’ve authorized payday lenders to charge a service fee of $15 per $100 loaned for each “deferred presentment services transaction.” In other words, every time someone needs to extend their loan, a lender could charge 15% of the balance. Unfortunately, when you compound this out, it becomes a pretty serious annual interest rate.
16 Responses to “Georgia Upholds Ban on Payday Loans”
Right. The 15% is what they were hoping to change it to if they were able to repeal the anti-payday law. As far as the 8% goes, I’m not sure if that’s per deferral, or annually — I suspect that it’s the latter; otherwise the payday loan industry wouldn’t have completely closed down in Georgia back in 2004. After all, 8% per deferral is still a ton of money. Remember, it specifies that the 8% limit applies to non-licensed lenders, such that banks and credit card companies can still exceed this amount (as they very often do).
Oh, as to the second part of your question (i.e., what happens when the loan exceeds $3k), I’m not sure. It’s possible that unlicensed lenders aren’t allowed to make loans over that amount, period. Of course, even if that were the case, it wouldn’t take long for a moderate-sized payday loan to compound to that point (and beyond).
So if you use a payday loan, there’s law protecting you from usury. You’re not so lucky if you use a credit card thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court (see Smiley v. Citibank). I find it ironic there’s so much regulation (and rightly so, don’t get me wrong) on pawn shops and payday loans in some states but banks can essentially charge whatever they want.
KMC: While I agree that credit cards can sometimes charge exorbitant rates, I’ve never heard of one with a 390% APR (or anything near that). Payday loan rates are typically an order of magnitude higher than credit cards.
The Georgia law that outlawed payday lending included exceptions for credit card banks and licensed finance companies. Payday lenders are unwilling to make loans as regulated rates. They could have done so before or after 2004 as licensed lenders.
The only thing that changed in 2004 was that payday lenders left the state because the legislature made it a felony to engage in unlicensed lending.
Payday lenders vow to bring this issue up again in 2008. They say that the market is demanding their product and that they intend to satisfy that demand. I suppose a crack dealer would justify his enterprise with the same sort of logic – the product is in high demand, so it must be a good idea, right?
The fact is that these loans push financially delicate borrowers beyond the tipping point, resulting in bankruptcies, foreclosures and the like. Those results carry with them severe societal costs, thereby making a nullity the payday inustry mantra of “let the private market dictate” the sort of transactions that should be legal.
Terrific news. Now those stinky useless poor people will keep having to go to the mafia when they need to borrow money! And the mob will not only charge them even MORE interest than that, but they’ll also break their legs and kidnap their children if they don’t pay promptly! Muahahaha!
But seriously…this talk of “predatory lending” is a joke. There are real predators out there, and laws like this one just give them more power and more customers. In the meantime, an industry that (unlike the competitors empowered by this law) has never killed or injured anyone, is being pushed out of the state of Georgia.
What everyone seems to be overlooking in this discussion is the fact that APR is irrelevant for a typical 14-day payday loan. A fee of $15 is just that, a one-time fee that doesn’t change over the course of the two week period. Not only that, but $15 to borrow $100 is cheaper than a bank’s NSF fee, credit card late fee or utility bill penalty charge. Groups that stand to gain from abolishing payday lending have so distorted the issue that the facts are seldom mentioned. But the truth about the industry is there for those who have the integrity to do the research.
I understand the average payday loan is $200 and fee Ga was going to allow was 15%. Sooo, how does a $30 fee become preditory. How does someone get stuck in the cycle of debt for $230 and can’t get out? All of this is from the Center for responsible lending, the left wing group who if your car is in the shop and payday is a week away….they make you walk! I would rather the CHOICE to pay the $30! Why do you think you need someone to protect you from yourself? Use common sense guys!
I worked for one of these sleazy PayDay companies many years ago. The owners wouldn’t provide any benefits whatsoever to their employees despite the obviously high net profits they nicely held for themselves. I’ve never worked with such greedy and unethical people since then.
I’m insulted by this law which implies that the “poor consumers” are children who have no idea what they’re signing or agreeing to. I used payday loans myself and have paid back every single one with no long term problems and they were essential when I was in a tight spot. The alleged cycle of debt is caused by the consumer themselves. Lenders will tell you that payday loan is meant to be SHORT TERM not a long term solution. And no I don’t work for a payday lender. I agree with the previous poster that banks and credit card companies are just as if not more abusive in their fees. The law DID NOT stop payday lending. People who can just go out of state now. And numbers of bounced checks, bank fees, overdrafts and bankruptcies actually went up in the state of GA after the ban. The only entity that this law helped in the long run was the banks.
Seriously, this is big government deciding how we should choose to do business.how much interest woul a bank be charging when they charge a 35.00 fee on a 1.47 dollar bounced check…now times that by three….hmmmm Banks get around this by calling it a fee. They are the ones making huge money. Payday loans ahave huge loss with those that don’t pay too remember they are taking a huge risk on low income clients. I might add there are high paid clients going for those loans too. They like to state low income most are not low income in fact all are employed and most make an average of 1435.00 per month take home. Most on ssi or ssd cannot get payday loans and if some companies do loan they loan small amounts to smaller incomes. We need to make our own decisions on who we do business with. Honestly,when i go to a payday loan company i know up front how much I have to pay. When I bounce one check I could be drowned in debt in days…You descide
Because rates and offers from advertisers shown on this website change
frequently, please visit referenced sites for current information. This website
may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate
programs or otherwise.
Advertiser Disclosure: Many of the savings offers
appearing on this site are from advertisers from which this website receives compensation for being listed here.
This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). These offers do not represent all deposit accounts available.
Editorial Disclosure: This content is not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of the bank advertiser, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. This site may be compensated through the bank advertiser Affiliate Program.
UGC Disclosure: These responses are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.
This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author’s alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.