The Georgia Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of two lenders charged with violating the state’s ban on payday loans. The two lenders, who were convicted of more than 40 violations, argued that the law violates the federal equal protection clause by unfairly targeting businesses located in Georgia. According to prosecutors, the two men subtly changed their business practices after the law was enacted. One puported to run a check-cashing service, and began referring the lending fee a “CheckGuard.” The other attempted to disguise the loans by including an option to buy a parcel of real estate that he owned — not surprisingly, no customers ever exercised that option. Both mean were given 15 years of probation, making them first Georgians to be successfully prosecuted under the law.
According to District Attorney Joe Mulholland:
“I’m not going to go out and celebrate, because I’m sure I’ll be doing this again next week. It’s kind of like the war on drugs, it’s never going away.”
I don’t see how this can be a good thing. This sets the precedent that the government can tell you how and how not to manage your finances. What’s next? A limit on the number of credit cards we can have? Business permits denied on the grounds that the business plan sounds too risky? How is it that government intrusion is welcomed in the South? We the people need to back the goverment out of our lives, not welcome it further into them.
Because rates and offers from advertisers shown on this website change
frequently, please visit referenced sites for current information. This website
may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate
programs or otherwise.
Advertiser Disclosure: Many of the savings offers
appearing on this site are from advertisers from which this website receives compensation for being listed here.
This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). These offers do not represent all deposit accounts available.
Editorial Disclosure: This content is not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of the bank advertiser, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. This site may be compensated through the bank advertiser Affiliate Program.
UGC Disclosure: These responses are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.
This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author’s alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.