<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roth IRA Conversion Limits Going Away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/05/17/roth-ira-conversion-limits-going-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/05/17/roth-ira-conversion-limits-going-away/</link>
	<description>personal finance tips, tricks, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:49:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thc</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/05/17/roth-ira-conversion-limits-going-away/comment-page-1/#comment-77798</link>
		<dc:creator>thc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 15:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2007/05/17/roth-ira-conversion-limits-going-away/#comment-77798</guid>
		<description>You keep referring to this provision of TIPRA as a &quot;loophole&quot;.  It&#039;s not a loophole at all, it was built into this legislation very intentionally because of the huge tax revenue windfall it will create especially for 2011 and 2012.  I have clients who will convert millions in 2010 and happily pay the taxes to be able to Rothify.  (Well, maybe not &quot;happily&quot;, but you get the picture).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You keep referring to this provision of TIPRA as a &#8220;loophole&#8221;.  It&#8217;s not a loophole at all, it was built into this legislation very intentionally because of the huge tax revenue windfall it will create especially for 2011 and 2012.  I have clients who will convert millions in 2010 and happily pay the taxes to be able to Rothify.  (Well, maybe not &#8220;happily&#8221;, but you get the picture).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
