Favorite Mutual Fund Companies: The Results
Just over a week ago I asked the following question:
If you were only allowed to choose one mutual fund company for your investments, which one would it be, and why?
As of this writing, here are the results…
Vanguard – 17 votes
T. Rowe Price – 3.5 votes
Fidelity – 3 votes
Dodge & Cox – 2 votes
Maires and Powers – 0.5 votes
(Although I asked for just one company, some people listed more than one. In those cases, I split the votes.)
My thoughts:
I doubt that anyone that knows anything about mutual funds is surprised to see Vanguard come out on top. While I didn’t weigh in previously because I didn’t want to bias the voting, Vanguard is my top choice, as well. My 403(b), SEP-IRA, and our non-retirement mutual fund holdings are all at Vanguard. In contrast, my defined contribution plan is at Fidelity and my 457(b) is at TIAA-CREF. Truth be told, the only reason these latter accounts aren’t Vanguard is that Vanguard isn’t an option.
To be honest, I was a bit surprised to see Fidelity get thrashed so soundly. Their a mainstream investment company with a lot of exposure in employer-sponsored plans, and a number of their index funds are actually a bit cheaper than their counterparts at Vanguard (at least for the time being).
Disclaimer: Discover is a paid advertiser of this site.
Reasonable efforts are made to maintain accurate information. See the Discover online credit card application for full terms and conditions on offers and rewards.
Filed under: Saving & Investing
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» Favorite Mutual Fund Company?» John Bogle’s Favorite Mutual Fund Companies
» Expense Ratios as Predictors of Mutual Fund Performance
» Schwab Mutual Funds: Ideal for Investors With Limited Means?
» Avoiding and Reducing Mutual Fund Fees and Expenses
» Mutual Fund Sales Loads: Just Say No
» Making Your Initial Mutual Fund Investment
» Target Date Mutual Funds Getting Cheaper
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
15 Responses to “Favorite Mutual Fund Companies: The Results”
Leave a Reply
Top Cards by Category
Earn 100 Reward Dollars after you make $1,000 in purchases in the first three months of Cardmembership.
Earn 25K Membership Rewards(R) points after you spend $2,000 during your first three months of Card membership.
Consumer friendly credit card with a great low rate of 7.25% and save on interest charges. No balance transfer fees and no annual fee.
The new Discover it card is out to change the way people think about credit cards. No annual fee. No overlimit fee. No foreign transaction fee & no pay-by-phone fee. No late fee on your first late payment. And Discover won't increase your APR for paying late.*
The new Discover it card is out to change the way people think about credit cards. No annual fee. No overlimit fee. No foreign transaction fee & no pay-by-phone fee. No late fee on your first late payment. And Discover won't increase your APR for paying late.*
Consumer friendly credit card with a great low rate of 7.25% and save on interest charges. No balance transfer fees and no annual fee.
Limited Time Offer: Get 25,000 Membership Rewards(R) points after you spend $5,000 in the first three months of Card membership. Enroll and select a qualifying airline to receive up to $200 annually in statement credits for incidental fees, such as checked bags and in-flight refreshments, charged by the airline.
The new Discover it card is out to change the way people think about credit cards. No annual fee. No overlimit fee. No foreign transaction fee & no pay-by-phone fee. No late fee on your first late payment. And Discover won't increase your APR for paying late.*
- How to Become a Millionaire
- How to Get Out of Debt
- The Best Dollars I've Ever Spent
- How Our Estate Plan is Structured
- How We Paid Our Mortgage In Less than 10 Years
- Money Making Ideas
- How to Manage Your Asset Allocation with Multiple Accounts
- Consumption Smoothing - Save While the Saving's Good
- How to Save on Groceries
- How Much Life Insurance Do You Need?
- Eleven Great Books About Money
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Pay Off Mortgage Early or Invest?
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Termite Control: Sentricon vs. Termidor
- How Much Should You Pay a Babysitter?
- Ethanol Blended Gas = Lower Mileage?
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Will Mac OS X Lion Kill Quicken 2007?
- Federal Income Tax Rates Went Down but Your Federal Tax Withholding Increased. Here's Why...
How to save money on insurance
- More money, more happiness: Do you think money can buy happiness?
- Overdraft fees soared to $32 billion in 2012
- How do you combat prom inflation?
- How should you choose a bank? Look in the mirror.
- The cost of clean water
- College debt 101
- Is it possible to live debt free?
- How to prepare for a home appraisal
- Home prices are up: good news or bad?
- A bit of foolishness
July 18th, 2007 at 10:46 am
I’m surprised to see Fidelity so far behind as well. The more I’ve researched funds and companies, the more I’ve seen Vanguard and Fidelity funds as comparable competitors (and at the top of the heap together). In any given fund type, one may be a little cheaper or a little more tax-efficient or perform a little better than the other, but I consider them to be pretty close. I have accounts with both and I really like the fund options they have.
July 18th, 2007 at 1:30 pm
Personally, I’m a Vanguard guy. I have never used Fidelity and do not have a close friend or family member who has used them, so all I have to go on is its fees, historical performance, etc. At the very least, Fidelity seems to be a poor man’s Vanguard.
July 18th, 2007 at 3:36 pm
I maintain the bulk of my money at T. Rowe Price. They offer no load, low-cost funds with excellent return (at least in my case) and the chance to start with just $50 (if you sign up for systematic investments). Thanks to them, and their low entry requirement, I have been able to steadily build a nice portfolio with an excellent return (so far).
July 18th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
I just don’t *trust* Fidelity, and view any price-cut on their part with skepticism. Bogle (and now Brennan) spent a lot of time building reputational capital–Vguard works (or has convinced us it works) on behalf of its shareholders, not against them. The Fidelities of the world are SALES organizations, focusing on revenue maximization for the firm OWNERS, not the mutual fund participants.
Oh, and indexes rule.
BTW, my vote for Dimensional was discounted… In some ways, they out-index Vanguard and, in the long run, they are not much more expensive (and have MUCH better allocation options).
July 18th, 2007 at 4:15 pm
I agree about the concerns over Fidelity’s low fees. They readily admit that their current fee structure is a discount over actual fees, which suggests they might be trying to capture market share, only to raise fees later. Since selling their funds down the road is a taxable event (in a non-retirement account, anyway) people will be reticent to flee in the event of a fee increase. Bottom line: I trust Vanguard a good bit more.
BTW, your vote for Dimensional was so heavily qualified (“in theory, were I able to overcome the up front fees”) that it didn’t get counted. My house, my rules…
But I do agree that they look interesting.
July 18th, 2007 at 6:23 pm
Vanguard would be my choice, as well, but Dodge & Cox would be a very close second. I own DODGX (Dodge & Cox Stock Fund) and DODFX (international fund) and the Dodge & Cox Income fund is excellent, too. Dodge & Cox favors value investing, which I think is the best long term strategy. The nod for me goes to Vanguard, however, because of its low fees and excellent index funds. Fortunately, we´re not limited to just one mutual fund company.
July 19th, 2007 at 11:05 am
I had never before heard about Fidelity’s low fees potentially being a short-term thing to lure in customers. That possibility would certainly tilt the scales if I was on the fence between them and Vanguard (which I’m not…Vanguard rocks).
July 19th, 2007 at 9:42 pm
Probably sensing that people were worried about the fees just being teasers, Fidelity contractually limited the expense ratios on a couple of their index funds and cannot raise them without shareholder approval. Their total market and S&P funds are both locked at 0.1%. FSTMX is my biggest holding and I’m not all that worried about a sudden fee change.
My main issue with Fidelity is that the low ratios only apply to a select couple of funds, and most of their other funds do not seem competitive. Also, their index funds have somewhat inconvenient minimums, $10k initial with $1k required additional investment.
July 20th, 2007 at 7:12 am
jpsfranks: True, but (for example) I recall reading about TIAA-CREF getting shareholder approval in a similar situation by basically saying “let us increase the fees or there’s a possibility that we might shut down the fund.” Of course, Vanguard could also raise fees, but I trust them more on this issue. Besides, Fidelity already admits that their fees are in some cases below the true cost to run the funds. Granted, this could be an entirely different sort of loss-leader, wherein they offer cut-rate prices not with the intention of jacking them up, but rather to attract business to their other, more profitable services. But shareholder approval isn’t a huge thing to overcome.
July 20th, 2007 at 10:19 am
I agree that getting shareholder approval to raise fees on a fund is not that much of an obstacle.
July 20th, 2007 at 9:36 pm
It’s certainly possible, and I’ve read about the TIAA-CREF case you mention, but I find it it hard to imagine Fidelity threatening to close the fund over fees. It seems to me that Fidelity wouldn’t have nearly as much leverage to try such shenanigans considering they’ve got a lot of retail customers who can simply walk, and it would be pretty embarrassing to be seen to capitulate like that as a credible index fund provider.
Anyways, I’m happy to take my chances with Fidelity. I find them overall to be an excellent brokerage with great customer service. I’d consolidate more there if their other funds were more competitive.
July 23rd, 2007 at 7:23 am
Is it possible that Fidelity are making a loss on some funds in order to get enough investments that the fee levels will be correct. I’m imagining that there are economies of scale with fund management, so if they could get the fund size big enough it may turn a profit without increasing fees.
July 23rd, 2007 at 7:30 pm
I buy ETFs instead of mutual funds… I like Vanguard and Rydex..
NCN
May 10th, 2009 at 7:32 pm
Dodge and Cox charges a $20 annual fee for IRA’s. I got out when I found that out. They are one of the very few funds around that I am aware of that charges this fee. Doesn’t seem very consumer friendly to me.
April 21st, 2011 at 11:35 am
Over the years, I’ve been a Vanguard fan. However recently, I wanted to open a joint (taxable) account at Vanguard and found that they do not allow a continguent beneficieary to be listed on such an account. This is important because if my wife and I both die in, say an auto accident, the account will transfer to our chosen people only through our Will. It will have to go through probate and then the lawyers will eat up most of the money. However Fidelity does allow the listing of continguent beneficiaries on these joint accounts. So I went with Fidelity. Am happy with them so far.