Congress Passes Temporary Fix for the Alternative Minimum Tax
Stumble It!
Digg It!
Tip It!
del.ico.us
FacebookIn case you haven’t heard, Congress pushed through a one year stay of execution for millions of middle class tax payers that otherwise would’ve been snagged by the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Without this fix, the number of filers subject to the AMT in would’ve jumped from 4 million in 2006 to 25 million in 2007. That’s the good news. The bad news is that the fix: (1) is temporary, (2) adds roughly $50 billion to the federal deficit since it’s not being offset by increased taxes in other areas or decreased spending, and (3) will delay tax refunds for as many as 38 million filers because the action was taken so late in the year.
[Source: NY Times]
Published on December 20th, 2007 - 9 Comments
Filed under: Taxes
email this article
- bookmark it
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» More AMT Insights» What is the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)?
» Income Tax Breaks in the Bailout Bill
» Should You Skip Your Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) in 2009?
» My First Encounter with the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)
» Qualifying for an ‘Economic Stimulus’ Tax Rebate Check
» Roth IRA Conversion Limits Going Away
» $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit Dropped from Stimulus Package
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
9 Responses to “Congress Passes Temporary Fix for the Alternative Minimum Tax”
Leave a Reply
Great deals...
Readers’ choice...
Recent articles...
- More on Lending Club's Reduced Interest Rates
- New Home, New Expenses
- Lending Club Reduces Interest Rates for Borrowers
- Save for Retirement With a Spousal IRA
- How to Handle a Missing 1099 Form
- Pursuing Financial Independence: Now What?
- Determining Your Financial Priorities
- Lending Club Update - December/January Performance
- 2010 Outlook for Mortgage Rates
- Reducing Your Automotive Expenses
Most talked about...
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- Pay Off Mortgage Early? Or Invest?
- Would the "Fair Tax" Gut the Economy?
- $7500 First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Tax Stimulus Rebate Payments to Start Early
- Best Online High Interest Savings Accounts (Updated!)
- Life's Too Short to Drink Cheap Beer
December 20th, 2007 at 3:36 pm
Good to know, but what is the AMT?
December 20th, 2007 at 4:20 pm
It’s an antiquated parallel tax system that is designed to keep the uber-wealthy from paying to little in taxes. Unfortunately, it’s not tied to the inflation rate, so more and more middle class families are being caught by it. I’ll be writing more on this topic soon, so keep an eye out.
December 20th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
Yes, and it hits those of us who live in high-tax states especially since for some reason AMT creators thought that only the rich take state income and property tax deductions. Also those who have lots of kids since only the uber-wealthy take exemptions for kids…
December 20th, 2007 at 6:16 pm
::sigh:: If they would just index things like this to inflation when they start…
December 20th, 2007 at 6:36 pm
Kitty: Tell me about it… We have four kids, and we’ve also experienced an uptick in income, so I’m a bit nervous. But at least we’re not in a high income tax state.
December 20th, 2007 at 6:37 pm
Ryan: You’re exactly right. If this was indexed to inflation, nobody would be sweating it right now (except those for whom it’s intended).
December 20th, 2007 at 7:00 pm
It’s so funny that so many things weren’t tied to inflation, as if that concept is so new…
December 20th, 2007 at 8:23 pm
Eh, it’s better than nothing…I’ll take it.
December 21st, 2007 at 1:47 pm
I’m not too familiar with AMT but if everyone is saying that the problem would be fixed by having it indexed to inflation, why isn’t the fix to just add all the years of inflation from 1969 from this point forward?