Adjust Text Size

Congress Passes Temporary Fix for the Alternative Minimum Tax

Written by Nickel - 9 Comments

Bank Deal: Earn 1.00% APY on an FDIC-insured savings account at Barclays Bank.

In case you haven’t heard, Congress pushed through a one year stay of execution for millions of middle class tax payers that otherwise would’ve been snagged by the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Without this fix, the number of filers subject to the AMT in would’ve jumped from 4 million in 2006 to 25 million in 2007. That’s the good news. The bad news is that the fix: (1) is temporary, (2) adds roughly $50 billion to the federal deficit since it’s not being offset by increased taxes in other areas or decreased spending, and (3) will delay tax refunds for as many as 38 million filers because the action was taken so late in the year.

[Source: NY Times]

Published on December 20th, 2007 - 9 Comments
Filed under: Taxes

About the author: is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!

Related articles...

Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:

You will receive only the daily updates, and can unsubscribe at anytime.

Comments (scroll down to add your own):

  1. Good to know, but what is the AMT?

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 20th 2007 @ 3:36 pm
  2. It’s an antiquated parallel tax system that is designed to keep the uber-wealthy from paying to little in taxes. Unfortunately, it’s not tied to the inflation rate, so more and more middle class families are being caught by it. I’ll be writing more on this topic soon, so keep an eye out.

    Comment by Nickel — Dec 20th 2007 @ 4:20 pm
  3. Yes, and it hits those of us who live in high-tax states especially since for some reason AMT creators thought that only the rich take state income and property tax deductions. Also those who have lots of kids since only the uber-wealthy take exemptions for kids…

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 20th 2007 @ 4:52 pm
  4. ::sigh:: If they would just index things like this to inflation when they start…

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 20th 2007 @ 6:16 pm
  5. Kitty: Tell me about it… We have four kids, and we’ve also experienced an uptick in income, so I’m a bit nervous. But at least we’re not in a high income tax state.

    Comment by Nickel — Dec 20th 2007 @ 6:36 pm
  6. Ryan: You’re exactly right. If this was indexed to inflation, nobody would be sweating it right now (except those for whom it’s intended).

    Comment by Nickel — Dec 20th 2007 @ 6:37 pm
  7. It’s so funny that so many things weren’t tied to inflation, as if that concept is so new…

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 20th 2007 @ 7:00 pm
  8. Eh, it’s better than nothing…I’ll take it.

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 20th 2007 @ 8:23 pm
  9. I’m not too familiar with AMT but if everyone is saying that the problem would be fixed by having it indexed to inflation, why isn’t the fix to just add all the years of inflation from 1969 from this point forward?

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 21st 2007 @ 1:47 pm

Leave a comment

Because rates and offers from advertisers shown on this website change frequently, please visit referenced sites for current information. This website may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate programs or otherwise.