Reaching the Mortgage Crossover Point
As a followup to my earlier note about refinancing our mortgage, I wanted to point out an interesting way of looking at things…
In the comments to that post, Laura brought up the concept of the mortgage “crossover point,” which is the point at which you are paying more toward principal than toward mortgage interest.
In looking at the amortization table for our original and new mortgage, I realized that this is a very powerful concept. Here’s a breakdown:
Under the terms of our old mortgage, and assuming no pre-payments, it would’ve taken 231 months, or 19.25 years, to reach the mortgage crossover point. Given that we were 21 months into our mortgage, that means it would be another 17.5 years before getting there.
Of course, we were were overpaying our mortgage every month, so we would’ve reached the crossover point much sooner. Those payments notwithstanding, however, we were still looking at a relatively long time horizon before our money was working more for us than for the bank.
What about the new mortgage? As it turns out, it will take just over 10 months to reach the mortgage crossover point. So, ignoring the possibility of mortgage pre-payments, we’ll reach the crossover point in January of 2009. Not bad at all.
Published on February 15th, 2008 - 10 Comments
Filed under: Mortgages
email this article
- bookmark it
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» What Would You Do With a Million Dollars?» Best High Mileage Cars
» What is a Mortgage Escrow Account?
» Debt Reduction: Share Your Story
» Beware the “No-Cost” Mortgage Refinance
» 40 Year Mortgages Going Mainstream
» Deciding When to Refinance Your Mortgage
» Pay Down Your Mortgage With ‘Found’ Money
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
Great deals...
Readers’ choice...
Recent articles...
- Effect of Foreclosure, Short Sale, and Bankruptcy on Your Credit Score
- DIY Garage Kayak Racks: Fast, Frugal, and Effective
- Lending Club $25 Bonus Reminder
- Coupons are a Waste?
- How to Save Money on Pet Care
- Best HSA Custodian?
- Considering a High Deductible Health Plan
- Pay Back the Homebuyer Tax Credit?
- How to Find a Good Deal
- How Much Does Your Debt Cost?
Recent comments...
- Jerry Robertson: Your article has great information about the large companies going out of business, but...
- laura: I have a foreclosure on my credit from Jan 2007 and my FICO score...
- nickel: Ron: Good question, and I have no idea as to the answer. It could...
- Christina: While foreclosures wreck less havoc on the score than a bankruptcy (according to your...
- Ron: Why do you think those large mortgage lenders are switching over to Vantage? Does...
- XY: I wish they would have special checkouts for people who plan to use 5...
- Live for Improvement: Going vertical with storage is definately the way to go! You should see my garage...
- Jessica: Just do a google search and it should be pretty easy to find. ...
Most talked about...
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- Would the "Fair Tax" Gut the Economy?
- Tax Stimulus Rebate Payments to Start Early
- Pay Off Mortgage Early? Or Invest?
- The Best Online Savings Accounts (Updated!)
- Life's Too Short to Drink Cheap Beer
- $7500 First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
Stumble It!
Digg It!
Tip It!
del.ico.us
Facebook
An interesting point. Ran some numbers, and factoring in how much I overpay, my current interest rate, theoretical 15 year mortgage interest rate, it comes out that my monthly payment would increase by $30 more than what I overpay, minimum payment would increase by $90, be done 3 and a half years earlier, and save me $14000 in interest. I need to call my motrgage broker!
Comment by Zachary Spencer — Feb 15th 2008 @ 11:22 amThis is a big difference between 15 and 30 year mortgages.
For 30 Years: At a rate of 4%, you are looking at 14 YEARS to reach crossover. 8% is about 23 years.
Even though a 15-year may cross over around 1-2 years, the general advice of it not making sense to prepay (or do a 15-year) makes sense.
Comment by ntguru — Feb 15th 2008 @ 12:55 pmIs there some software to help figure this stuff out? I could use some help.
Comment by Ron@TheWisdomJournal — Feb 15th 2008 @ 10:48 pmRon,
Try this…
http://www.bankrate.com/brm/popcalc2.asp
Comment by Dave — Feb 16th 2008 @ 7:39 am…always remember you’re using a ‘Rubber-Ruler’ when calculating with ‘U.S. Dollars’ — especially with long term stuff like mortgages.
“Inflation” constantly reduces the actual value (purchasing power) of a Dollar. That makes it much harder to calculate the ‘true’ mortgage crossover point.
Of course, inflation is good news for mortgagees because you’re paying back the lender with paper Dollars worth less than those you borrowed to buy your house
Over a 30 year mortgage period, say 1977 to 2007 — the Dollar lost over 70% of its value. $100,000 in 1977 is worth well less than $28,000 today, even by the official U.S. government statistics.
Rubber-Rulers give you wrong answers.
Comment by Caldwell — Feb 16th 2008 @ 1:19 pmCaldwell: Valid point in general, but… In any given year a dollar of principal is equal to a dollar of interest. Now, if you were making an argument based on returns on money that you invest vs. prepaying your mortgage, then I’d buy your argument. But, in this case, no matter how much your money devalues between now and the crossover point, that point will still occur when the dollars toward principal = dollars toward interest.
#
Caldwell: Valid point in general, but… no matter how much your money devalues between now and the crossover point, that point will still occur when the dollars toward principal = dollars toward interest. {Comment by nickel}
_____
…so what’s the significance of a ‘crossover point’ anyway ??
It’s significant because (without inflation) it marks the calendar date where the borrower starts seriously reducing the ‘principal’ (outstanding balance) of the money originally borrowed– and that’s the only way to ever pay off a loan.
However, in our real American world, inflation has already seriously reduced that owed principal… long before that nominal crossover point.
If one borrowed $100K on a 30-Year Mortgage in January 1977, the ‘principal’ owed to the lender would be $100K in January 1977 “U.S. Dollars”.
However, in just 5 years (.. by Jan 1982) inflation reduced the actual value of that principal to only $63,000 (.. in 1982 Rubber-Dollars). The borrower did not have to wait 19.25 years on a paper to seriously reduce the principal he owed the lender — and it required no borrower effort or cost.
And even at a nominal 19.25 year paper crossover point (..April 1996) — the real principal remaining was $38K. The mortgage borrower had already effortlessly reduced the principal he owed by over 60%… despite what the original 1977 amortization schedule said.
________
That’s why inflation is such a disruptive force in our economy; few people understand it or can compensate for it overall. And inflation is always a deliberate Federal government policy (”legal counterfeiting” for government spending), not some mysterious force of nature or economics.
The official CPI inflation rate is now about 4% annually. That rate is now over 7%, using the previous method of Federal calculation (before they ‘adjusted’ their methodology in the mid 1990’s to reduce “Official” inflation rates).
Food & Fuel prices today average 13% higher than Jan 2007, even by official government statistics.
What do think the U.S. Dollar wil be worth after 30 years, on a new mortgage today ?
========
Comment by caldwell — Feb 17th 2008 @ 10:16 amI continue to be torn between prepaying the mortgage and investing. I’m refinancing from a 6.375% 15yr to a 5.75% 30yr this week. My investment is buy-and-hold index funds, so I don’t have virtually any trading costs and the funds are low-turnover. I would love to be completely debt free, but I can’t help but think that this is more of an emotional decision than a logical one.
Comment by CPA1298 — Feb 17th 2008 @ 8:39 pmCaldwell: You’re arguing about something entirely different. My only point was to look at the fraction of your payment that goes toward principal vs. interest. Nothing more, nothing less. No matter how much you inflate (or deflate) the economy, it’s still a straight up, dollar-for-dollar comparison. When the amount of your payment going toward principal exceeds the amount going toward interest, you’ve reached what I (and another commenter) have termed the crossover point. I understand the effects of inflation perfectly well, and you’ve made a valid (and important) point about how the value of the money that you owe decreases over time. But it has nothing to do with the simple point that I was making.
@ CPA 1298
IMHO, a split is best.Take the extra you would be paying against your mortgage, split it in half, and invest half. If you don’t have alot of investments built up already, the mortgage can wait.
If you’ve got a quarter mill in stocks already, then pay the mortgage off at any speed you so desire
Zach
Comment by Zachary Spencer — Feb 19th 2008 @ 10:17 am