<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Manage Your Asset Allocation With Multiple Accounts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/</link>
	<description>personal finance tips, tricks, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:11:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thankful</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-126288</link>
		<dc:creator>Thankful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/#comment-126288</guid>
		<description>Little late to the party, but I love Morningstar&#039;s Instant Xray--I just found it a couple of weeks ago, and breaks down stocks and mutual funds across several accounts into one big, easy to understand allocation analysis.

http://portfolio.morningstar.com/NewPort/Free/InstantXRayDEntry.aspx?dt=0.7055475</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little late to the party, but I love Morningstar&#8217;s Instant Xray&#8211;I just found it a couple of weeks ago, and breaks down stocks and mutual funds across several accounts into one big, easy to understand allocation analysis.</p>
<p><a href="http://portfolio.morningstar.com/NewPort/Free/InstantXRayDEntry.aspx?dt=0.7055475" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://portfolio.morningstar.c.....=0.7055475</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris I.</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-116175</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/#comment-116175</guid>
		<description>Hi Nickel,

While your approach sounds promising for the reasons you mention, it seems that it might make it difficult to rebalance because you can&#039;t easily rebalance across accounts.  A big benefit of asset allocation in my mind is that it gives you the opportunity to rebalance in times when one asset class does well and another does poorly, e.g. a year in which bonds have increased in value, but stocks have decreased in value.  By rebalancing you are systematically buying low and selling high, one of the basic tenets of successful investing.

When one of your retirement accounts exclusively holds one asset class while another exclusively holds another asset class, rebalancing becomes difficult because now you MUST look at all of your accounts in order to rebalance, presumably in a third account.  In that sense, it seems like the work you&#039;ve saved yourself by requiring fewer rebalancing transactions in a subset of the accounts has increased the amount of work you have to do (evaluating all of the accounts together) to determine what transactions need to be made.

On the other hand, you are wise to allocate between your taxable and tax advantaged accounts to minimize your overall tax burden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nickel,</p>
<p>While your approach sounds promising for the reasons you mention, it seems that it might make it difficult to rebalance because you can&#8217;t easily rebalance across accounts.  A big benefit of asset allocation in my mind is that it gives you the opportunity to rebalance in times when one asset class does well and another does poorly, e.g. a year in which bonds have increased in value, but stocks have decreased in value.  By rebalancing you are systematically buying low and selling high, one of the basic tenets of successful investing.</p>
<p>When one of your retirement accounts exclusively holds one asset class while another exclusively holds another asset class, rebalancing becomes difficult because now you MUST look at all of your accounts in order to rebalance, presumably in a third account.  In that sense, it seems like the work you&#8217;ve saved yourself by requiring fewer rebalancing transactions in a subset of the accounts has increased the amount of work you have to do (evaluating all of the accounts together) to determine what transactions need to be made.</p>
<p>On the other hand, you are wise to allocate between your taxable and tax advantaged accounts to minimize your overall tax burden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-116171</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/#comment-116171</guid>
		<description>This is a great way to allocate investment types.  I&#039;ve done it this way for a few years, but I ran into a small problem.  I focused all my energy on the account with the largest holdings, and as such the others became stagnant.  It&#039;s easy to lose sight of the smaller accounts, so you have to be very disciplined when you take this allocation approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great way to allocate investment types.  I&#8217;ve done it this way for a few years, but I ran into a small problem.  I focused all my energy on the account with the largest holdings, and as such the others became stagnant.  It&#8217;s easy to lose sight of the smaller accounts, so you have to be very disciplined when you take this allocation approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-116165</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/#comment-116165</guid>
		<description>The Diehards forum (http://www.diehards.org/) has a LOT of information on asset location most people have never thought of.  I highly suggest every investor with serious money on the line frequent that forum.  The beauty of tax-advantaged accounts is you can buy and sell as often as you want to get your asset allocation just how you want it without having to worry about taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Diehards forum (<a href="http://www.diehards.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.diehards.org/</a>) has a LOT of information on asset location most people have never thought of.  I highly suggest every investor with serious money on the line frequent that forum.  The beauty of tax-advantaged accounts is you can buy and sell as often as you want to get your asset allocation just how you want it without having to worry about taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-116164</link>
		<dc:creator>nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/#comment-116164</guid>
		<description>Chris: Quicken does the same thing (though I don&#039;t think it allows you to split up things like Target Retirement Funds into their component parts). But...

Knowing the percentages isn&#039;t want I&#039;m concerned about. I&#039;m more concerned about managing them in the simplest and most tax efficient way possible. I don&#039;t want to have to tweak seven different accounts to keep things in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: Quicken does the same thing (though I don&#8217;t think it allows you to split up things like Target Retirement Funds into their component parts). But&#8230;</p>
<p>Knowing the percentages isn&#8217;t want I&#8217;m concerned about. I&#8217;m more concerned about managing them in the simplest and most tax efficient way possible. I don&#8217;t want to have to tweak seven different accounts to keep things in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJB</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-116162</link>
		<dc:creator>CJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/#comment-116162</guid>
		<description>I have been using Microsoft Money for about 10 years now and I think it is an excellent way to look at the &quot;big picture&quot; of your finance.  I have about six different equity accounts (Etrade, Schwab, Ameritrade, 401k, etc) and Money puts them all together and shows me what my TOTAL allocation is.  It does not matter if one account is all cash, and the other all stocks, it&#039;s my total allocation that I am be concerned with.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Microsoft Money for about 10 years now and I think it is an excellent way to look at the &#8220;big picture&#8221; of your finance.  I have about six different equity accounts (Etrade, Schwab, Ameritrade, 401k, etc) and Money puts them all together and shows me what my TOTAL allocation is.  It does not matter if one account is all cash, and the other all stocks, it&#8217;s my total allocation that I am be concerned with.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-116161</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/03/27/how-to-manage-your-asset-allocation-with-multiple-accounts/#comment-116161</guid>
		<description>You could go over to the diehards forum and post your idea. There are some smart people there that will give perceptive tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could go over to the diehards forum and post your idea. There are some smart people there that will give perceptive tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
