Investigating Mutual Fund Correlations
Stumble It!
Digg It!
Tip It!
del.ico.us
FacebookThis is just a quick note to point out a useful tool that I ran across while researching our ideal asset allocation. Simply head over to Adviser Online’s Fund Correlation Tool and you can easily determine the correlation between any pair of Vanguard mutual funds.
In case you’re not familiar with the concept of correlation, it’s simply a statistical measure of the degree to which two variables change in concert. A correlation of +1 refers to an increasing linear relationship, whereas a correlation of -1 refers to a decreasing linear relationship. A correlation of zero means that two variables move independently of one another.
While I’m grossly oversimplifying things here, a properly diversified portfolio contains a variety of different security classes with low or even negative correlations. Having this sort of investment mix helps to ensure that when some of your investments are suffering, others are thriving (or at least suffering less), thereby reducing your overall investment risk.
Note that the fund correlation tool reports the correlation coefficient in terms of percentages, so the data points can actually range from -100 to +100.
Some examples…
Large Cap Index vs. Small Cap Index: 89%
Total Stock Market Index vs. Total International Index: 74%
Total Stock Market Index vs. Total Bond Market Index: -17%
Even if you don’t have access to Vanguard funds, this is a great tool for getting a feel for how different asset classes perform relative to one another.
As you can see from above, domestic equities exhibit a relatively strong positive correlation with each other, even when comparing between large and small cap stocks. Likewise, domestic and international equities are reasonably well correlated, though less so than large vs. small cap stocks.
In contrast, stocks and bonds have a slight negative correlation, meaning that increasing in stock values are typically accompanied by decreases in bond prices, and vice versa.
Published on April 16th, 2008 - 9 Comments
Filed under: Online, Saving & Investing
email this article
- bookmark it
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» How Much International Exposure Should Your Portfolio Have?» Favorite Mutual Fund Company?
» Schwab Mutual Funds: Ideal for Investors With Limited Means?
» Mutual Fund Sales Loads: Just Say No
» Favorite Mutual Fund Companies: The Results
» Converting Mutual Funds Into Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) Without Incurring Taxes
» Google as a Mutual Fund?
» Index Mutual Funds vs. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
Great deals...
Readers’ choice...
Recent articles...
- Effect of Foreclosure, Short Sale, and Bankruptcy on Your Credit Score
- DIY Garage Kayak Racks: Fast, Frugal, and Effective
- Lending Club $25 Bonus Reminder
- Coupons are a Waste?
- How to Save Money on Pet Care
- Best HSA Custodian?
- Considering a High Deductible Health Plan
- Pay Back the Homebuyer Tax Credit?
- How to Find a Good Deal
- How Much Does Your Debt Cost?
Recent comments...
- nickel: Ron: Good question, and I have no idea as to the answer. It could...
- Christina: While foreclosures wreck less havoc on the score than a bankruptcy (according to your...
- Ron: Why do you think those large mortgage lenders are switching over to Vantage? Does...
- XY: I wish they would have special checkouts for people who plan to use 5...
- Live for Improvement: Going vertical with storage is definately the way to go! You should see my garage...
- Jessica: Just do a google search and it should be pretty easy to find. ...
- Just J: I use many of these ideas weekly, we shop for a family of 6,...
- Molly: The new, expanded income limits apply only to those who purchased their home after...
Most talked about...
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- Would the "Fair Tax" Gut the Economy?
- Tax Stimulus Rebate Payments to Start Early
- Pay Off Mortgage Early? Or Invest?
- The Best Online Savings Accounts (Updated!)
- Life's Too Short to Drink Cheap Beer
- $7500 First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
This is why a little exposure to bonds is always a good bet. I wouldn’t put a large percentage or my portfolio there but having a little balance doesn’t hurt.
Comment by Saving Freak — Apr 16th 2008 @ 11:23 amWow, I never thought concepts from my “Probabilistic Methods” class would ever be useful for me. Makes me wish I didn’t sell my textbook!
Comment by P.R. — Apr 16th 2008 @ 12:55 pmOne thing I’ve been curious about in terms of “secure” portion of a portfolio is why the bonds are usually mentioned instead of CDs. Sure at some point in the 80s, bonds had higher yields, but recently, the yield on CDs is higher than yield-to-maturity on AAA bonds — just searched through AAA bonds on my brokerage account.
I am not talking about bond funds, since these don’t have maturity date and carry a whole lot more risk than individual AAA-rated bonds.
This is a question to those more knowledgeable than I am. A bunch of my CDs mature in May, and I\’ve been trying to find some good place for them which has to be in \”safe\” portion of my portfolio to maintain my desired allocation. I’ve already bought max allowed number of series I bonds for the year.
Comment by kitty — Apr 16th 2008 @ 1:22 pmThanks for linking to this tool, it’s a new one to me. I’m surprised to see large cap to small cap at just 89%. Of course, correlations change over time, so we need to keep checking back.
Comment by The Dough Roller — Apr 16th 2008 @ 1:32 pmThis is an useful tool. Does anybody know how far back they go in calculating these correlations? I’m guessing it’s 36 months since that’s what Vanguard reports on their website. It would be even more interesting if they had a way to compare 3 or 4 funds with each other in a portfolio and calculate the CAGR and Std Dev of the portfolio over the past 36 months or whatever time period they use.
Comment by Kyle — Apr 16th 2008 @ 1:56 pmNot to get too geeky, but a correlation of -1 is also a perfect linear relationship, just as +1 is, albeit inverse. Just trying to clarify your “a correlation of -1 refers to a decreasing linear relationship” statement.
Nice tool though, very useful.
Comment by Steve — Apr 17th 2008 @ 10:16 amSteve: I’m not sure exactly what you’re trying to correct. Linear = linear. Had I said “approximately linear” then you’d have a point, but when someone specifies a linear relationship, it’s typically in reference to a 1 to 1 (or 1 to -1) relationship (i.e., “perfectly” linear).
Correction withdrawn as it looks like Wiki has your terminology also. My thought was that your wording implied the linear relationship is decreasing (growing weaker) as it reached -1.
We must have different backgrounds, but correlations are always described as positive/negative linear or direct/inverse linear in my field to avoid this very confusion.
Comment by Steve — Apr 17th 2008 @ 1:18 pmGotcha… Yes, I can see how decreasing vs. negative could be confusing. I was thinking in terms of the slope of the relationship. Thanks for the clarification.