<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recovering From the Crash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/</link>
	<description>personal finance tips, tricks, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jimmydageek</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130115</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmydageek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130115</guid>
		<description>Regarding continuing to fund retirement accounts, I certainly am doing that. But every time I see that deduction on my pay stub, I am reminded of the frightened Cowardly Lion, standing in the Haunted Forest, repeating aloud &quot;I do believe in ghosts. I do believe in ghosts. Oh, I do, I do, I do, I do&quot;

We must continue to believe in our economy, in our recovery, and in dollar-cost-averaging. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding continuing to fund retirement accounts, I certainly am doing that. But every time I see that deduction on my pay stub, I am reminded of the frightened Cowardly Lion, standing in the Haunted Forest, repeating aloud &#8220;I do believe in ghosts. I do believe in ghosts. Oh, I do, I do, I do, I do&#8221;</p>
<p>We must continue to believe in our economy, in our recovery, and in dollar-cost-averaging. <img src='http://www.fivecentnickel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130098</link>
		<dc:creator>Nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130098</guid>
		<description>LAL: Another thing to consider is that the brackets themselves might change. There are no guarantees that the lowest bracket will remain at 15%. In fact, given recent spending, overall tax rates will almost certainly be going up in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LAL: Another thing to consider is that the brackets themselves might change. There are no guarantees that the lowest bracket will remain at 15%. In fact, given recent spending, overall tax rates will almost certainly be going up in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAL</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130097</link>
		<dc:creator>LAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130097</guid>
		<description>The conversion to a ROTH IRA might not be worth it depending on your tax bracket.  You might be solidly in the 15% bracket when you retire and can properly manage your withdrawals from retirement accounts.

You have to consider your tax bracket now and potentially then.

If you are in a high bracket say 28% and this kicks you up to 33% is it really worth it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conversion to a ROTH IRA might not be worth it depending on your tax bracket.  You might be solidly in the 15% bracket when you retire and can properly manage your withdrawals from retirement accounts.</p>
<p>You have to consider your tax bracket now and potentially then.</p>
<p>If you are in a high bracket say 28% and this kicks you up to 33% is it really worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDFD at DivorcedDadFrugalDad</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130076</link>
		<dc:creator>DDFD at DivorcedDadFrugalDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130076</guid>
		<description>Now is the ideal time to invest . . . what&#039;s done is done.  Solid advice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now is the ideal time to invest . . . what&#8217;s done is done.  Solid advice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130047</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130047</guid>
		<description>Good idea on the putting money to work, my bank&#039;s APY for checking is 0.0% and Savings is 0.4%.

I move my money out of there and into my online savings as often as I can, even if the interest rate is way down from before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea on the putting money to work, my bank&#8217;s APY for checking is 0.0% and Savings is 0.4%.</p>
<p>I move my money out of there and into my online savings as often as I can, even if the interest rate is way down from before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130040</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130040</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the good points! I always like to hear CFPs since they really study this stuff and work with it every day. Great guest choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good points! I always like to hear CFPs since they really study this stuff and work with it every day. Great guest choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130039</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130039</guid>
		<description>@ Dylan

Your right in the managed futures.  They are a high cost investment and are not right for every person. Nowadays, you can purchase open-end mutual funds as well as the commodity ETF to get some exposure.   I&#039;ve been using them as a portion of certain client&#039;s portfolios (5-10% max) for the past several years.  I didn&#039;t just jump on the bandwagon.   In 2006 and 2007 (more so 2007), clients were wondering why we were in these.  2006 we were up, 2007 futures were down about 4%.  My sole reasoning was diversification, not chasing returns.  2008 is another story.   We were up over 20% in that portion of our portfolios. (That was the only thing that made money).  In meeting with new clients, I never use &quot;return&quot; as a reason for any investment choice.  Chasing returns will get you burned as investor (as you stated) and selling them will get you fried as an advisor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dylan</p>
<p>Your right in the managed futures.  They are a high cost investment and are not right for every person. Nowadays, you can purchase open-end mutual funds as well as the commodity ETF to get some exposure.   I&#8217;ve been using them as a portion of certain client&#8217;s portfolios (5-10% max) for the past several years.  I didn&#8217;t just jump on the bandwagon.   In 2006 and 2007 (more so 2007), clients were wondering why we were in these.  2006 we were up, 2007 futures were down about 4%.  My sole reasoning was diversification, not chasing returns.  2008 is another story.   We were up over 20% in that portion of our portfolios. (That was the only thing that made money).  In meeting with new clients, I never use &#8220;return&#8221; as a reason for any investment choice.  Chasing returns will get you burned as investor (as you stated) and selling them will get you fried as an advisor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130037</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130037</guid>
		<description>You had me up until the plug for managed futures.  (Caution: rant against managed futures coming.)  Those are pure bets, not diversification.  I&#039;ve heard all the &quot;risk reduction&quot; arguments, and they are all based entirely on past performance, not of an asset or market, but of a trading strategy.  

Those funds typically have high fees, usually above 2%, some as high as 8%.  Since futures trading is a zero-sum game, once you introduce fees, it&#039;s now negative sum.  Long term, odds are greater that you will lose more than you can gain.

The last time managed futures funds were the hot thing was during the last bear market, but eventually luck ran out, many faced huge draw downs, and many went under.

They&#039;re an easy sell based on past performance in a down market, but a lot of the people that made money at the end of the day were the brokers that sold them.  Many of these funds pay brokers commissions that are significantly higher than other products.  That should be a red flag when a fund feels the need to pay higher than average commissions in order to compete in the marketplace.

I also suspect that many of the people selling these in a retail setting do not actually understand them.  Too often, I see people&#039;s money placed with more than one manager that are actually betting against each other.  They are essentially paying management fees to both bet on red and black at the same time, a wash.

I&#039;ll admit I&#039;m not a fan of these products (obviously), but the last thing people should be doing right now is chasing past performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had me up until the plug for managed futures.  (Caution: rant against managed futures coming.)  Those are pure bets, not diversification.  I&#8217;ve heard all the &#8220;risk reduction&#8221; arguments, and they are all based entirely on past performance, not of an asset or market, but of a trading strategy.  </p>
<p>Those funds typically have high fees, usually above 2%, some as high as 8%.  Since futures trading is a zero-sum game, once you introduce fees, it&#8217;s now negative sum.  Long term, odds are greater that you will lose more than you can gain.</p>
<p>The last time managed futures funds were the hot thing was during the last bear market, but eventually luck ran out, many faced huge draw downs, and many went under.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re an easy sell based on past performance in a down market, but a lot of the people that made money at the end of the day were the brokers that sold them.  Many of these funds pay brokers commissions that are significantly higher than other products.  That should be a red flag when a fund feels the need to pay higher than average commissions in order to compete in the marketplace.</p>
<p>I also suspect that many of the people selling these in a retail setting do not actually understand them.  Too often, I see people&#8217;s money placed with more than one manager that are actually betting against each other.  They are essentially paying management fees to both bet on red and black at the same time, a wash.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit I&#8217;m not a fan of these products (obviously), but the last thing people should be doing right now is chasing past performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaxRascal</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130036</link>
		<dc:creator>TaxRascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130036</guid>
		<description>This is a great post. Sometimes, it&#039;s helpful to ask what you&#039;d think if you hadn&#039;t lost money. What if, for example, the years from 1996 to 2009 had seen a fairly stable Dow going up about 1% per year. By 2009, most stocks would look like screaming bargains, despite the recession.

This is definitely solid advice, though. We won&#039;t pull out of the current slump until people start investing again, and this is an important part of that process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post. Sometimes, it&#8217;s helpful to ask what you&#8217;d think if you hadn&#8217;t lost money. What if, for example, the years from 1996 to 2009 had seen a fairly stable Dow going up about 1% per year. By 2009, most stocks would look like screaming bargains, despite the recession.</p>
<p>This is definitely solid advice, though. We won&#8217;t pull out of the current slump until people start investing again, and this is an important part of that process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130035</link>
		<dc:creator>GM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130035</guid>
		<description>I wonder if numbers can be run on some sample data to give an idea on the returns?

For instance a 40 year old with 25K in their 401K. Maybe 25% tax bracket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if numbers can be run on some sample data to give an idea on the returns?</p>
<p>For instance a 40 year old with 25K in their 401K. Maybe 25% tax bracket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130034</guid>
		<description>@ Amy

I think we&#039;ve all studied history and I could inundate you with facts and figures that show the recent market drop does rank as &quot;one of the worst&quot;.  Now keep in mind that I am forever the &quot;Bull&quot; and believe the market will come around.

Besides, it wasn&#039;t a statement, it was a question hence the &quot;?&quot; at the end of the sentence.  Even if it was a statement, I hardly see it as &quot;irresponsible&quot;.  With the market being down 50% from it&#039;s 2007 high, I&#039;m fairly certain that this is up there with the worst of them.  But maybe with your studies, you can enlighten us differently?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Amy</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ve all studied history and I could inundate you with facts and figures that show the recent market drop does rank as &#8220;one of the worst&#8221;.  Now keep in mind that I am forever the &#8220;Bull&#8221; and believe the market will come around.</p>
<p>Besides, it wasn&#8217;t a statement, it was a question hence the &#8220;?&#8221; at the end of the sentence.  Even if it was a statement, I hardly see it as &#8220;irresponsible&#8221;.  With the market being down 50% from it&#8217;s 2007 high, I&#8217;m fairly certain that this is up there with the worst of them.  But maybe with your studies, you can enlighten us differently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130032</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130032</guid>
		<description>Does anybody feel like the 2008 stock market crash has been one of the worst ever? 

No, because I have studied history. We&#039;d all be a lot less panicked if everyone stopped telling us how terrible everything is. This is not even close to being &quot;one of the worst&quot; financial downturns &quot;ever.&quot; Please stop making irresponsible statements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody feel like the 2008 stock market crash has been one of the worst ever? </p>
<p>No, because I have studied history. We&#8217;d all be a lot less panicked if everyone stopped telling us how terrible everything is. This is not even close to being &#8220;one of the worst&#8221; financial downturns &#8220;ever.&#8221; Please stop making irresponsible statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130027</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130027</guid>
		<description>@ Neal

The last time I ran some numbers for somebody was the middle of 2007 (including transaction costs, taxes, etc) when the market was still respectable.  The person was in their late 20&#039;s and a decently high tax bracket, and after about 20 years is when we saw the advantage of the Roth conversion.  It&#039;s hard to run general numbers because there are too many factors at play (tax bracket, time horizon, investment selection, etc.).

The only thing that I can conclude is that with accounts being down as much as they are, the tax bill is obviously much smaller.  With all my write off&#039;s from starting my new business, I was able to convert my rollover IRA to a Roth this year.  I thought about waiting until 2010, but my optimistic outlook was that my funds would have grown by then and I would be forced to pay more (albeit over the course of two years).   So with the lower tax bill, my gut is telling me that the break even would be much shorter for me and anybody else that has time on their side.  A 50 year old converting to a Roth has more to consider than I did when I converted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Neal</p>
<p>The last time I ran some numbers for somebody was the middle of 2007 (including transaction costs, taxes, etc) when the market was still respectable.  The person was in their late 20&#8217;s and a decently high tax bracket, and after about 20 years is when we saw the advantage of the Roth conversion.  It&#8217;s hard to run general numbers because there are too many factors at play (tax bracket, time horizon, investment selection, etc.).</p>
<p>The only thing that I can conclude is that with accounts being down as much as they are, the tax bill is obviously much smaller.  With all my write off&#8217;s from starting my new business, I was able to convert my rollover IRA to a Roth this year.  I thought about waiting until 2010, but my optimistic outlook was that my funds would have grown by then and I would be forced to pay more (albeit over the course of two years).   So with the lower tax bill, my gut is telling me that the break even would be much shorter for me and anybody else that has time on their side.  A 50 year old converting to a Roth has more to consider than I did when I converted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Frankle</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130025</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Frankle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130025</guid>
		<description>Not sure about the Roth conversion.  Could you run some numbers and examples?  The way I figure, it rarely works out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure about the Roth conversion.  Could you run some numbers and examples?  The way I figure, it rarely works out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2009/03/12/recovering-from-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-130023</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fivecentnickel.com/?p=3220#comment-130023</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip about the 401k conversion.  I&#039;ve been meaning to read up on that as I should qualify and that will save me thousands down the road.

To all the readers, do not give up hope on the stock market.  Prices are down because so many people have given up on it already.  There will be a recovery, patience my friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip about the 401k conversion.  I&#8217;ve been meaning to read up on that as I should qualify and that will save me thousands down the road.</p>
<p>To all the readers, do not give up hope on the stock market.  Prices are down because so many people have given up on it already.  There will be a recovery, patience my friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

