Investment Performance: It’s a Matter of Perspective
Have you looked at any stock market charts recently? The market has risen for four straight weeks, and things are looking up. In terms of raw numbers, the S&P is up nearly 50% from its March lows. Here’s the chart.

Given the above, the stock market is really on a tear. Right? Well… It’s depends on your perspective. Let’s step back and see how things look since the Fall of 2007.

Ouch. Even after the rally this spring/summer, the S&P 500 is still down roughly 35%. Let’s look back a bit further.

Hmmm… A rough ride, but the market is up 22% since the Fall of 2002. What happens if we look back even further?

Yikes. Another rough ride, but this time the news is considerably worse. Down 33% over the past nine years.
Okay, lets step way back to gain a bit of historical perspective…

Interestingly, if you look at that last chart, you’ll see a very steady progression until right around 1994. After that, you get two major spikes followed by painful periods of “regression to the mean.” Note that there was also a less pronounced blip in the runup to Black Monday in October 1987, which marked the largest one day percentage decline in stock market history. Even still, we’ve seen a better than 980% gain since 1970.
I haven’t actually played with the raw data, but just by eyeballing things, it looks like we’re still a bit short of where we would’ve been if that pre-1994 historical growth pattern had continued. I’m not going to make any arguments about whether or not the stock market is currently over- or under-valued, as I really don’t know, and you also can’t tell by looking at price alone.
To me, the most important lesson here is that you need to interpret investment news very, very carefully. Moreover, you need to keep your personal timeframe in mind when making investment decision. Over short time periods, things can get wild. As you ratchet back to much longer timeframes, however, things become more predictable.
Note: Yes, I picked and chose the start dates for these periods to make things look as good or bad as possible. That’s the point.
Published on August 10th, 2009 - 9 Comments
Filed under: Saving & Investing
email this article
- bookmark it
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» Leverage: Home Appreciation vs. Investment Perfomance» Investment Performance: CDs vs. Stocks
» Investment Insights: Past Performance
» Playing the Percentages: The Effect of Gains and Losses
» A Bit of Investing Perspective
» The Definition of Overpaid
» Investment Performance: Stocks vs. Bonds
» How to Track Lending Club Investments in Quicken
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
Great deals...
Readers’ choice...
Recent articles...
- Effect of Foreclosure, Short Sale, and Bankruptcy on Your Credit Score
- DIY Garage Kayak Racks: Fast, Frugal, and Effective
- Lending Club $25 Bonus Reminder
- Coupons are a Waste?
- How to Save Money on Pet Care
- Best HSA Custodian?
- Considering a High Deductible Health Plan
- Pay Back the Homebuyer Tax Credit?
- How to Find a Good Deal
- How Much Does Your Debt Cost?
Recent comments...
- Tim Rosen: Pros and Cons: Pros: a.) A systematic discipline to save/invest on a regular basis, for a...
- Matt Jabs: @Tim: Thanks, I hope this article helps get even one person on the...
- Tim Rosen: Excellent Matt! A very practical, real-world plan that I believe anyone can "flesh out"....
- Jerry Robertson: Your article has great information about the large companies going out of business, but...
- laura: I have a foreclosure on my credit from Jan 2007 and my FICO score...
- nickel: Ron: Good question, and I have no idea as to the answer. It could...
- Christina: While foreclosures wreck less havoc on the score than a bankruptcy (according to your...
- Ron: Why do you think those large mortgage lenders are switching over to Vantage? Does...
Most talked about...
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- Would the "Fair Tax" Gut the Economy?
- Tax Stimulus Rebate Payments to Start Early
- Pay Off Mortgage Early? Or Invest?
- The Best Online Savings Accounts (Updated!)
- Life's Too Short to Drink Cheap Beer
- $7500 First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
Stumble It!
Digg It!
Tip It!
del.ico.us
Facebook
I think this post is a very neat idea. Great job visually illustrating the importance of holding period.
I would add one caveat: Admittedly, to my knowledge, the market has been particularly volatile over the last decade and a half. However, in the last chart, it’s visually exacerbated by the fact that the volatility in the earlier periods (though significant as a percentage) looks insignificant simply because all of the amounts are small.
Comment by Mike Piper — Aug 10th 2009 @ 9:34 amIts a little freaky when you play with the time on your investment accounts. Just to see how things were going I requested the YTD on my 401(k) – HELL YEAH UP 22%. Then I did the 1 year return – down 30% OUCH!
Comment by My Journey — Aug 10th 2009 @ 12:56 pmMike: I agree that we’d see a lot more volatility if we re-scaled the data. For example, Black Monday looks like a blip when it was actually a watershed even. That being said, I think you’re right that the ups and downs of the past 10-15 years have been atypical.
Great charts Nickel! I think the bottom line is that an 8% average return is overly optimistic. 5% is a more realistic return to calculate one’s pro-forma retirement plan. Perhaps even 4%.
I have sold 75% of all my equities over the past 2 weeks. I would suggest taking profits. Afraid of the September double dip!
Rgds, RB
Comment by RB @ RichBy30RetireBy40 — Aug 11th 2009 @ 12:27 amOne thing the engineer in me recommends (that I’ve never seen done) is to plot the data on a semi-log graph. That is, plot time on the linear,horizontal axis the way you did, but plot the logarithm of the Dow Jones or S&P on the vertical axis. This would give a better picture of the percentage impact of gains and drops over the years.
Comment by Paul — Aug 11th 2009 @ 11:06 amPaul: I agree that a semi-log plot would be a great way to look at these data. Unfortunately, I didn’t have the time when writing this post, and the variability issue wasn’t actually the point. Nonetheless, I think it’s a great idea. If the engineer in you is looking to kill some time, be sure to send me a copy!
Great post, and it really serves to highlight the fact that when investing for the long term you don’t need to worry about short term (month-by-month, let alone day-by-day) fluctutations.
PS: Google finance actually has a setting change the charts from linear to semi-log!
Comment by Cecil — Aug 14th 2009 @ 9:16 pmNice graphs. I love how you can see the two big bubbles on the last chart.
Well, I don’t love that the bubbles happened, but it is a really interesting and informative set of graphs.
FYI: I accepted this article into the Carnival of Economic Fun #2. It will appear on Wednesday, September 16th. Thanks for submitting.
Comment by Tony @ This Young Economist — Sep 10th 2009 @ 10:12 pmGreat post, I totally agree that long term investment is very safe, people who are planning for investing will get good information from this post.
Comment by Samson Smith — Sep 25th 2009 @ 2:37 am