Investment Performance: Average vs. Compound Returns
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics.
-Benjamin Disraeli
Given the huge amount of volatility in the stock market over the past year or two, I wanted to take a moment to remind you to be careful when evaluating investment claims. Whenever you look at a potential new investment, it’s very important to look at how the returns are being reported.
The problem here stems from the difference between the average of the annual returns and the compound annual growth rate (CAGR). For the mathematically inclined, the former is calculated as an arithmetic mean, whereas the latter is based on a geometric mean.
An investment example
The underlying problem is perhaps best illustrated with a simple example…
Consider a hypothetical $10,000 investment that suffers a 50% loss over the span of a year. Despite the carnage, you sit tight and wait patiently for a recovery. Good news! During the following year, things are looking up and your investment appreciates by 60%.
As anyone who has tracked their portfolio values of the past couple of years can attest, a 50% loss one year followed by a 60% gain the next year does not result in a profit. Sure, the “average” annual return is 5% per year, but your $10k dropped to $5k and then bounced back up to $8000 — a $2000 net loss.
This is where CAGR comes in.
Calculating your compound return
To more properly express the performance of your investment, you need to compound the performance over time. CAGR is calculated according to the following equation:
CAGR = [(Final Value/Initial Value) ^ (1/# of years)] - 1
In words, divide the final value by the initial value, raise the resulting value to the power of 1 over the number of years in question, and then subtract 1.
In the example above, CAGR would be estimated as follows:
CAGR = [(8000/10000) ^ 1/2] - 1 = -0.1056
That is, you would have experienced a compounded loss of 10.56% per year. For what it’s worth, the math works the same whether your investments go up or down. The only difference is that the CAGR will be positive in periods when you post a gain.
Closing thoughts
Of course, there are still some limitations to CAGR, as it only looks at the beginning and end points and then smooths out everything in between. Thus, it really don’t give you a sense for the volatility inherent in a given investment. It does, however, give you a much more realistic expectation of investment performance.
The good news is that mutual funds are now required to report their returns in a fairly standard (and accurate) manner. This does not, however, stop unscrupulous “advisers” from twisting the truth to make a certain investment look more promising. Investor beware.
Published on June 9th, 2010 - 3 Comments
Filed under: Saving & Investing
email this article
- bookmark it
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» Investment Insights: Past Performance» Past Performance Does Not Predict Future Returns
» Leverage: Home Appreciation vs. Investment Perfomance
» Investment Performance: CDs vs. Stocks
» The High Cost of Low Risk Investing
» What Inflation Will Do to Your Retirement Savings
» Safe Withdrawal Rates, Investment Returns, and Minimizing Your Expenses
» Playing the Percentages: The Effect of Gains and Losses
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
3 Responses to “Investment Performance: Average vs. Compound Returns”
Leave a Reply
Financial Shopping Center
Mortgage rates are at an all-time low
Earn interest on your savings
Find lower insurance rates
Featured Credit Cards
-
Chase FreedomSM Visa - $100 Bonus Cash Back
Earn $100 Bonus Cash Back after you make $799 in purchases in your first three months. No Annual Fee. 5% cash back offers in popular categories. See terms.
-
Discover® More® Card - $75 Cashback Bonus®
$75 Cash Back when you make $500 in purchases in the first 3 months. No annual fee. 5% to 20% Cashback Bonus at over 150 top retailers Discover's online shopping mall. See terms.
Great deals...
Readers’ choice...
Recent articles...
- Link Roundup: Transmission Trouble Edition
- Stop Learning and Start Earning
- Mixed Banking News From the FDIC
- Hotel Alternatives: Save Money When Traveling
- Paying Down Debt With a HELOC
- Flexible Spending Account Changes for 2011 and Beyond
- Claim Your Credit Card Rewards
- How Many Checks Do You Write?
- Character Flaws and Financial Success
- On Debt Freedom and Being Weird
Most talked about...
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- Pay Off Mortgage Early? Or Invest?
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Would the "Fair Tax" Gut the Economy?
- Termite Control: Sentricon vs. Termidor
- Current High-Yield Online Savings Account Rates
- $7500 First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Ethanol Blended Gas = Lower Mileage?
Stumble It!
Digg It!
Tip It!
del.ico.us
Facebook
June 9th, 2010 at 12:13 pm
For those of us who aren’t in it for the year to year swings but are in it for the long hall, this is a great tool. Thanks for the example Nickel.
June 10th, 2010 at 12:39 am
I use CAGR to caculate the performance of my 401(k) portfolio. Unless you’re tracking every cent you’re earning/contributing and when (which if WAY TOO MUCH effort in my eyes), then CAGR makes it MUCH simpler to do the calculations. And it’s rough enough, and reasonably accurate enough.
June 11th, 2010 at 10:56 pm
Most results are based annually so they are deceptive. The stock market is no longer the investment instrument it was 25 years ago anyway. Its manipulated by things like chat boards, day traders,and internet news. Long term look for something else too – rental property, farm income, etc. You will be better off…