Will the IRS Disallow Backdoor Roth Contributions?

I’ve talked quite a bit about making “backdoor” Roth contributions if you’re over the income limits for contributing to a Roth IRA. In short, you can make a non-deductible contribution to a traditional and then immediately convert it into their Roth.
This strategy has become so popular that mainstream publications such as Forbes have started talking about it. But is it legal? That was the topic of a recent discussion over on the Bogleheads forum.
This discussion was prompted by an article by Michael Kitces, who is a financial planner extraordinaire and the Director of Research for the Pinnacle Advisory Group.
According to Kitces, while the individual steps of the backdoor Roth maneuver don’t run afoul of IRS regulations, these contributions could be disallowed under the step transaction doctrine.
The step transaction doctrine is a legal principle that essentially allows the IRS to look at the overall effect of a multi-step transaction and treat it as a single, integrated event.
In other words, rather than looking at the legality or tax treatment of individual steps, the IRS is free to look at the overall result of the transaction — i.e., that an individual over the contribution limits was able to make a Roth IRA contribution — and tax (or penalize) it accordingly.
So… The question is whether or not the IRS would balk at backdoor Roth contributions. I’m not particularly concerned about it, in part because the removal of income limits for converting funds to a Roth IRA appears to have been specifically intended to allow high income individuals to do just that, but…
It seems at least theoretically possible that the IRS could view this as an over-contribution, which comes with a recurring penalty of 6%/year (albeit with a 3 year statute of limitations), and these transactions could be messy to unwind.
At the same time, it’s worth noting that IRA expert Ed Slott weighed in on this issue last spring, arguing that the step transaction doctrine is a non-issue for backdoor Roth contributions.
My pal TFB has also tackled the subject. The short version is that he’s recharacterizing his recent conversions, and will re-convert at a later date to reduce the odds of his conversions being viewed through the lens of the step transaction doctrine.
What about you? If you’ve been making backdoor Roth contributions, are you concerned about running afoul of the IRS?
Disclaimer: Discover is a paid advertiser of this site.
Reasonable efforts are made to maintain accurate information. See the Discover online credit card application for full terms and conditions on offers and rewards.
Modified on February 6th, 2012 - 9 Comments
Filed under: Retirement, Saving & Investing, Taxes
About the author: Nickel is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!
Related articles...
» 2013 Roth IRA Contributions Complete» Contribute and Convert: Funding Our Roth IRAs Through the Backdoor
» Quick, Fund an IRA for 2011
» Using Roth IRA Funds to Pay Off Debt
» Withdrawing Your Roth IRA Contributions (Followup)
» Roth IRA Income Limits for 2007
» Traditional IRA vs. Roth IRA: What’s Your Preference?
» Contribute to Your Roth IRA, Even if it Stretches Your Budget
Was this article useful? Please sign up to receive our content via e-mail:
9 Responses to “Will the IRS Disallow Backdoor Roth Contributions?”
Leave a Reply
Top Cards by Category
Earn 100 Reward Dollars after you make $1,000 in purchases in the first three months of Cardmembership.
Bonus Miles: Earn 30,000 bonus miles toward Award Travel after you spend $500 on the Card within the first three months of Cardmembership. Earn As You Spend: Get 2X miles on Delta purchases and 1X miles for all other eligible dollars spent.
Consumer friendly credit card with a great low rate of 7.25% and save on interest charges. No balance transfer fees and no annual fee.
The new Discover it card is out to change the way people think about credit cards. No annual fee. No overlimit fee. No foreign transaction fee & no pay-by-phone fee. No late fee on your first late payment. And Discover won't increase your APR for paying late.*
The new Discover it card is out to change the way people think about credit cards. No annual fee. No overlimit fee. No foreign transaction fee & no pay-by-phone fee. No late fee on your first late payment. And Discover won't increase your APR for paying late.*
Consumer friendly credit card with a great low rate of 7.25% and save on interest charges. No balance transfer fees and no annual fee.
Limited Time Offer: Get 25,000 Membership Rewards(R) points after you spend $5,000 in the first three months of Card membership. Enroll and select a qualifying airline to receive up to $200 annually in statement credits for incidental fees, such as checked bags and in-flight refreshments, charged by the airline.
The new Discover it card is out to change the way people think about credit cards. No annual fee. No overlimit fee. No foreign transaction fee & no pay-by-phone fee. No late fee on your first late payment. And Discover won't increase your APR for paying late.*
- How to Become a Millionaire
- How to Get Out of Debt
- The Best Dollars I've Ever Spent
- How Our Estate Plan is Structured
- How We Paid Our Mortgage In Less than 10 Years
- Money Making Ideas
- How to Manage Your Asset Allocation with Multiple Accounts
- Consumption Smoothing - Save While the Saving's Good
- How to Save on Groceries
- How Much Life Insurance Do You Need?
- Eleven Great Books About Money
- Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math
- Dish Network Customer Service SUCKS
- $8,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Pay Off Mortgage Early or Invest?
- How to Claim the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Termite Control: Sentricon vs. Termidor
- How Much Should You Pay a Babysitter?
- Ethanol Blended Gas = Lower Mileage?
- Reduced Credit Limits? Share Your Experience
- $15,000 Homebuyer Tax Credit
- Will Mac OS X Lion Kill Quicken 2007?
- Buying Furniture off the Back of a Truck
How to save money on insurance
- How I cut my spending in half to take a job I loved
- Working longer: Fallback or fallacy?
- More money, more happiness: Do you think money can buy happiness?
- Overdraft fees soared to $32 billion in 2012
- How do you combat prom inflation?
- How should you choose a bank? Look in the mirror.
- The cost of clean water
- College debt 101
- Is it possible to live debt free?
- How to prepare for a home appraisal
February 1st, 2012 at 11:14 am
Nina Olson (National Taxpayer Advocate employed by the IRS) now has a tax blog. Why not ask her? I recognize it is her opinion but it would be a pretty high up the ladder opinion?
http://www.taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov/Home/Blog
February 1st, 2012 at 11:27 am
It’s a tough call, because while the removal of income limits for conversions of IRAs to Roths does seem to allow for backdoor contributions, you have to wonder why income limitations for Roth contributions wouldn’t have also been eliminated. I spoke with an IRA company that seemed to believe this was all legal and good. I would have to imagine that if this was an issue the IRS would have already issued some sort of guidance.
February 1st, 2012 at 12:06 pm
Thank you Nickel for the link. While I still believe it’s perfectly legal, I also think there is no reason to push it to the extreme unnecessarily. Putting in a time buffer will still preserve 99% of the benefits from Backdoor Roth.
February 1st, 2012 at 4:14 pm
The IRS set the contribution limit on a Roth IRA for a reason. They do not want people with AGI’s over 107k contributing to a Roth IRA. I say if you can get away with the backdoor Roth, go for it! But beware, the IRS has the right to come after you one day..
February 1st, 2012 at 6:16 pm
I haven’t heard much about backdoor Roth, but it sounds like a good plan for people over the limit. I should check into this more.
February 2nd, 2012 at 12:12 pm
Another option if you have non W2 income is to set up an individual (aka solo) 401(k). Vanguard has low or no fee solo 401(k) options and you can choose to set up both a traditional pre-tax 401(k) and a post-tax Roth 401(k). It’s quite easy to set up and maintain and you can move money directly from a checking account into the Roth 401(k), without going through special hoops.
February 3rd, 2012 at 1:10 pm
I’ve done it for the past two years. I’m not concerned about it either. I think that if it was making that big of an impact on tax revenue, there will be a quick addition to the tax code that will disallow the action.
I hope you don’t mind, but to echo your post, I recently wrote a how-to on my own site on how to contribute to a Roth IRA via the backdoor method. I think everyone who is not qualified to contribute to a Roth IRA directly should take advantage of the loophole for as long as it exists.
February 3rd, 2012 at 9:28 pm
The step transaction doctrine is usually a losing argument for the IRS.
February 9th, 2012 at 12:32 am
I’m going into my third year of doing backdoor Roth IRAs. I’m really not worried about the step transaction doctrine. Plus a 3 year statute of limitations? At most I’d have to unwind $30K in backdoor Roths. Trivial compared to the benefits. This is money that would otherwise be in a taxable account.