Adjust Text Size

Accuracy of EPA Gas Mileage Estimates

Written by Nickel - 27 Comments

Bank Deal: Earn 1.00% APY on an FDIC-insured savings account at Barclays.

Consumer Reports just published a series of articles on EPA mileage estimates and how they compare to real-world results. As it turns out, 90% of all vehicles surveyed got worse than expected mileage, with the biggest discrepancies (up to 50% below EPA estimates) occurring in city driving. Even those thrifty hybrids are getting in on the action, with city mileage falling up to 19 MPG short of the EPA estimates. Most troubling of all is that the gulf between the EPA values and real-world results appears to have been growing over time. In short, while the EPA estimates allow you to make comparions amongst makes/models, they’re not very good indicators of actual mileage. Until the system is overhauled, CR suggests that you discount the EPA estimates for city travel by the following amounts: conventional cars and trucks, 30 percent; larger hybrids, 35 percent; diesels, 36 percent; smaller hybrids, 42 percent.

Published on September 29th, 2005 - 27 Comments
Filed under: Automotive,Energy

About the author: is the founder and editor-in-chief of this site. He's a thirty-something family man who has been writing about personal finance since 2005, and guess what? He's on Twitter!

Comments (scroll down to add your own):

  1. Nice to know that a government agency can’t give consumers accurate information. What is the point of epa estimates for fuel mileage if we can’t even take them at face value and have to “discount” them by certain percentages?

    I’ve always liked how Car & Driver (or maybe it was Motor Trend), did long term tests (1 year or so) and had an accurate true cost information, which included the mpg of the car over that time period.

    Comment by Anonymous — Sep 29th 2005 @ 9:02 am
  2. As inaccurate as they are, there is still some value to these estimates in that you can make relative comparison between different makes/models. Clearly, a car that is rated for 35 MPG will get better mileage than one that is rated for 15 MPG, even if neither one approaches their actual rating.

    Comment by Nickel — Sep 29th 2005 @ 5:26 pm
  3. With hybrids I’ve heard the EPA estimates are way off and consequently customers are complaining. But with diesel I’ve read, heard, and experienced the opposite. Many drivers of the newer VW TDI’s have experienced better mileage than what the EPA estimates. In my case, a much older VW diesel (1992), my actual mileage is bang on the EPA figures

    Comment by Anonymous — Sep 30th 2005 @ 9:16 am
  4. In my experience with a 93 sentra, 2000 and 97 maxima and 2004 mpv I’ve found the EPA actually quite accurate. I’d say it’s optimistic by as much 10-20% on the MPV, which was the one furthest off epa, but with my 2000 maxima the EPA was, if anything, pessimistic, as I’ve occasionally gotten better than EPA on the highway. The other cars it was reasonably close. Remember, highway would be at 65-70, not at 80 with the AC on. City would be gentle driving, not hammering it.

    Comment by Anonymous — Sep 30th 2005 @ 9:35 am
  5. I totally agree with Matt B. I have a 2003 Nissan Altima 2.5, and I am getting EPA or better mileage. You just have to drive carefully. Many (most?) drivers seem to be trying very hard to get the worst mileage they can…

    Comment by Anonymous — Sep 30th 2005 @ 1:02 pm
  6. To expect a single number (one for each City and Highway) to reflect the driving styles, passenger loads, road conditions, etc. is assinine. People are just looking for faults where I’d say the gov’t is actually doing a good job. As for the hybrids I can only guess that the EPA’s statistical forecast algorithm thingamabobber (technical term) is tuned for gasoline-only cars. It has, after all had over 20 years to tune it.

    My ’00 Saturn SC2 is rated at 27/37. My commute is about 4 miles city, 8 miles highway and I get between about 30 and 35MPG. I drive aggressively some days, and almost always accelerate quickly (no spinning) at a green light. I imagine I could easily get over 35MPG if I didn’t go quickly from a dead stop, or use engine braking on the highway rather than causing traffic by flashing brakelights for a 5MPH speed adjustment.

    My $0.02

    Comment by Anonymous — Sep 30th 2005 @ 1:41 pm
  7. I had a Grand Cherokee achieve substantially better mileage than the EPA rating. Do the math before buying a hybrid – at $3.30/gal for fuel, it’ll take 36 years to break even if I replace my ’91 Corvette with a Prius, and that is going by the overly optimistic EPA rating.

    Oh – CHECK THE AIR IN YOUR TIRES. It makes a big difference (and don’t forget the spare).

    Comment by Anonymous — Sep 30th 2005 @ 4:12 pm
  8. Yeah, those EPA estimates are always high…

    Comment by Anonymous — Sep 30th 2005 @ 10:46 pm
  9. Reverend: Great reminder on checking the air in your spare — it does no good if it’s flat when you need it!

    Comment by Nickel — Sep 30th 2005 @ 11:03 pm
  10. Even the EPA itself doesn’t reccomend their estimates for more than an “apples to apples” comparison. The virtue of those numbers is that they’re based on a standardized set of tests applied the same way to every vehicle. Your mileage will vary based on all the things no statistic on the sticker could ever cover accurately (road conditions, driving habits, vehicle load, etc), but the EPA tests provide a method for an accurate comparison of the factors in fuel economy that are built into vehicle design.

    So yeah…don’t plan your monthly budget down to the penny based on plugging your new car’s EPA mileage into a calculator and doing the arithmetic…but that doesn’t mean the numbers aren’t good for anything.

    Comment by Anonymous — Oct 1st 2005 @ 1:40 am
  11. I get just as good or better mileage than rated on my 93 Sentra. People are probably complaining about these EPA results because they drive the hell out of their cars. Of course you’re not going to get 30mpg city if you’re flooring it all the time. I can easily get 30mpg city b/c I don’t drive like a moron of the common extreme go to an extreme stop attitude.

    Comment by Anonymous — Nov 3rd 2005 @ 1:09 am
  12. I found this at the top of EPA’s fuel economy page:

    IMPORTANT REMINDER: EPA’s Fuel Economy estimates are designed to allow consumers to comparison shop. Your fuel economy will almost certainly vary from EPA’s fuel economy rating. This is based on a number of factors, such as how you drive and maintain your vehicle, use of air conditioning and other accessories, weather, road conditions, and other factors. EPA is currently evaluating ways to improve our fuel economy estimates so they better reflect real-world driving, and we plan to propose changes in the coming year. For more information on how your fuel economy can vary, or tips to improve your fuel economy, please visit Your MPG Will Vary and Gas Mileage Tips on

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 24th 2005 @ 2:34 am
  13. What do you expect from the government, accuracy? 😉

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 24th 2005 @ 4:03 pm
  14. They should talk to Consumer Reports. They’ve tried providing them a better method for testing that for years now.

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 27th 2005 @ 7:55 am
  15. CR is a great resource for buying almost anything. We’ve used it for years and always refer to it before buying anything. In fact, we just used it this weekend as we’re looking for a new dishwasher.

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 27th 2005 @ 8:41 am
  16. It’s one of the few magazines that does not get tossed in the recycling bin when we finish reading it.

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 28th 2005 @ 9:39 am
  17. Us too. We actually save our old copies in a file and then pull them out when we have a buying decision. Well worth the subscription (though you can get the info free from the library).

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 28th 2005 @ 1:36 pm
  18. Given that the magazine has no advertisers and runs mostly on subscription and donation income, I don’t mind subscribing.

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 28th 2005 @ 2:27 pm
  19. Blaine — That’s how I feel. It’s almost like a contribution.

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 29th 2005 @ 7:02 am
  20. Yeah, except that it is not tax deductible.

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 29th 2005 @ 8:05 am
  21. Yea, but for $12 (or whatever it is) who cares?

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 29th 2005 @ 1:31 pm
  22. I don’t. But you are the one that said that it is almost like a contribution. I was just pointing out the difference. Heheh.

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 29th 2005 @ 1:43 pm
  23. I said “almost”. 😉

    Comment by Anonymous — Dec 30th 2005 @ 8:48 am
  24. FWIW, making sure your tire pressure is at the maximum is very important in the estimate. Along with proper vehicle maintenance.
    Our Sienna experienced much less than what the EPA estimate was. However, after we upped the pressure to the maximum 51 psi, the average mileage has already started climbing (it keeps track of this for you).
    If a tire is not at the maximum psi, the tires will often wear on the outsides of the tire, and if it’s too much pressure, they will wear off faster on the center portion of the tire itself.

    Comment by Anonymous — Oct 6th 2006 @ 11:25 am
  25. There is a group of us out there that actually NEED a pickup sized vehicle for our work. The best I’ve been able to do is a Chevy WT (work truck) rated at 22/18 with a 4.2 (or 4.3 rounded way up for the market) engine. Now, I only need that size/load capacity/power for about 20% of the time. The other 80% I could use a smaller, more efficient vehicle but the logistics of using two vehicles at the right times is prohibitive due to nationwide travel and cost of ownership of two vehicles. I am strapped to a $3,000/year fuel cost because, if I can’t perform that 20% of the time, I’m out of a job. I strongly invite suggestions.

    Comment by Anonymous — Jun 12th 2007 @ 11:04 pm
  26. Hmmm. This article made a thesis that has not been answered – the creep of estimates over time. Not quite the same as the accuracy issue. We know the govt has been doing this with inflation data (per and we know that big money (Goldman Sachs, etc.) owns govt. This requires that an analysis must disentangle actual economy improvements from data creep. Any thoughts?

    Comment by Anonymous — Apr 6th 2012 @ 8:52 am
  27. EPA – DOE Issue 2005 Vehicle Fuel Economy Ratings

    Fuel economy estimates are determined by averaging numbers gathered through tests conducted by manufacturers and verified by EPA. Vehicles are tested in a controlled laboratory setting and the results are adjusted to reflect actual driving conditions. All vehicles are tested in the same way so consumers can compare the results when choosing a vehicle type or class. The mpg estimates appear on window stickers on all new cars and light trucks prior to sale. To ensure these estimates continue to remain as reliable as possible, EPA has begun a collaborative process with various stakeholders to update its testing procedures, and plans to propose appropriate changes in the next year.

    Comment by Anonymous — Apr 6th 2012 @ 9:10 am

Leave a comment

Because rates and offers from advertisers shown on this website change frequently, please visit referenced sites for current information. This website may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate programs or otherwise.